King Nathan, Pickett William, Pankow Kurtis, Dimitropoulos Gina, Cullen Emma, McNevin Stephen, Patten Scott B, Duffy Anne
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;69(12):841-851. doi: 10.1177/07067437241295640. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
To describe student access to university mental health services and barriers and gaps in support.
This multiple cohort study used self-report data from 4,138 undergraduate students who completed the U-Flourish Well-Being Survey at the start and completion of first year from 2018 to 2023. The survey incorporated validated measures of mental health symptoms, barriers to care, and open-text questions about the mental health care experience and perceived gaps. Quantitative analyses summarized utilization patterns and barriers. An interpretive qualitative analysis identified common themes about support services and opportunities for improvement from the student perspective.
At university entry, 43% of students screened positive for anxiety and/or depression, 30% reported a lifetime mental disorder and 23% a lifetime history of self-harm. Over first year, 15% of students surveyed accessed university mental health services. Access was more likely in students identifying as older, gender diverse, female, having a prior mental disorder and those who screened positive for anxiety or depression. Common attitudinal and practical barriers reported included (74%), (73%), and (50%). Common stigma barriers included . Students expressed that both campus-based well-being and mental health care offered during flexible hours and accessible through online booking were important.
Student-tailored mental health literacy may be a sustainable approach to address the attitudinal and practical barriers identified. If such barriers are reduced, an increased service demand would be expected and improved efficiencies needed. A clear Statement of Services, an online singular point of access with embedded triage to signpost students to indicated levels of care, and clearly worked-out care pathways including to community-based services would better align with a stepped care model, improve efficiency and access, and foster realistic expectations around university mental health support.
描述学生获得大学心理健康服务的情况以及支持方面的障碍和差距。
这项多队列研究使用了4138名本科生的自我报告数据,这些学生在2018年至2023年大一学年开始和结束时完成了“U-蓬勃发展幸福感调查”。该调查纳入了经过验证的心理健康症状、护理障碍测量方法,以及关于心理健康护理经历和感知差距的开放式问题。定量分析总结了使用模式和障碍。一项解释性定性分析从学生角度确定了关于支持服务和改进机会的共同主题。
入学时,43%的学生焦虑和/或抑郁筛查呈阳性,30%的学生报告有终身精神障碍,23%的学生有终身自伤史。在大一学年,15%的受访学生使用了大学心理健康服务。年龄较大、性别多元、女性、有精神障碍史以及焦虑或抑郁筛查呈阳性的学生更有可能使用服务。报告的常见态度和实际障碍包括(74%)、(73%)和(50%)。常见的污名化障碍包括 。学生们表示,校园内灵活时间提供且可通过在线预约获得的幸福感和心理健康护理都很重要。
针对学生的心理健康素养可能是解决所确定的态度和实际障碍的可持续方法。如果这些障碍减少,预计服务需求将会增加,需要提高效率。一份清晰的服务声明、一个带有嵌入式分诊的在线单一接入点,以便为学生指明护理级别,以及明确制定的护理途径,包括通往社区服务的途径,将更好地与分级护理模式相匹配,提高效率和可及性,并培养对大学心理健康支持的现实期望。