Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jun;28(2):e1754. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1754. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
The majority of university students with mental health problems are untreated. Only a small empirical literature exists on strategies to increase mental health service use.
To investigate the effects and moderators of a brief acceptance-facilitating intervention on intention to use mental health services among university students.
Within the German site of the World Health Organization's World Mental Health International College Student (WMH-ICS) initiative, 1,374 university students were randomized to an intervention condition (IC; n = 664) or a control condition (CC; n = 710) that was implemented in the survey itself. Both conditions received the questions assessing mental disorders and suicidality that were included in other WMH-ICS surveys. The IC group then additionally received: Internet-based personalized feedback based on subject symptom severity in the domains of depression, anxiety, substance use, suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and nonsuicidal self-injury; psychoeducation tailored to the personal symptom profile; and information about available university and community mental health services. The primary outcome was reported intention to use psychological interventions in the next semester, which was the last question in the survey. A broad range of potential moderating factors was explored.
There was a significant main effect of the intervention with students randomized to IC, reporting significantly higher intentions to seek help in the next semester than students in the CC condition (d = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.23). Moderator analyses indicated that the intervention was more effective among students that fulfilled the criteria for lifetime (d = 0.34; 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.7) and 12-month panic-disorder (d = 0.32; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.74) compared with those without lifetime (d = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.22) or 12-month panic disorder (d = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.22), students with lower (d = 0.37; 95% CI: -0.77 to 1.51) than higher (d = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.34) self-reported physical health, and students with nonheterosexual (d = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.67) compared with heterosexual (d = 0.06; 95% CI: -0.06 to 0.17) sexual orientation. The intervention had no effects among students who reported that they recognized that they had an emotional problem and "are already working actively to change it" (Stage 4 "stages of change").
A simple acceptance-facilitating intervention can increase intention to use mental health services, although effects, are on average, small. Future studies should investigate more personalized approaches with interventions tailored to barriers and clinical characteristics of students. In order to optimize intervention effects, the development and evaluation should be realized in designs that are powered to allow incremental value of different intervention components and tailoring strategies to be evaluated, such as in multiphase optimization designs.
大多数有心理健康问题的大学生都未得到治疗。关于增加心理健康服务使用的策略,仅有少量的实证文献。
调查简短的接受促进干预对大学生使用心理健康服务的意图的效果和调节因素。
在世界卫生组织世界心理健康国际大学生(WMH-ICS)倡议的德国网站内,1374 名大学生被随机分配到干预组(IC;n=664)或对照组(CC;n=710),该干预在调查中实施。两组都接受了评估精神障碍和自杀意念的问题,这些问题包含在其他 WMH-ICS 调查中。IC 组随后还收到了:基于抑郁、焦虑、物质使用、自杀意念和行为、非自杀性自我伤害等领域的个人症状严重程度的基于互联网的个性化反馈;针对个人症状概况量身定制的心理教育;以及有关大学和社区心理健康服务的信息。主要结果是报告在下一个学期使用心理干预的意向,这是调查中的最后一个问题。探索了广泛的潜在调节因素。
干预有显著的主要效果,与 CC 组相比,随机分配到 IC 组的学生报告在下一个学期寻求帮助的意向显著更高(d=0.12,95%置信区间:0.02 至 0.23)。调节分析表明,该干预在符合终身(d=0.34;95%置信区间:-0.08 至 0.7)和 12 个月惊恐障碍(d=0.32;95%置信区间:-0.10 至 0.74)标准的学生中更有效,而不是在没有终身(d=0.11;95%置信区间:0.00 至 0.22)或 12 个月惊恐障碍(d=0.11;95%置信区间:0.00 至 0.22)的学生中,在自我报告的身体健康状况较低(d=0.37;95%置信区间:-0.77 至 1.51)的学生中比身体健康状况较高(d=-0.01;95%置信区间:-0.36 至 0.34)的学生中,在非异性恋(d=0.38;95%置信区间:0.08 至 0.67)的学生中比异性恋(d=0.06;95%置信区间:-0.06 至 0.17)的学生中,干预效果更为显著。在报告他们意识到自己有情绪问题并“已经积极努力改变它”的学生中(“改变阶段”的第 4 阶段),干预没有效果。
一种简单的接受促进干预可以增加使用心理健康服务的意图,尽管平均效果较小。未来的研究应该调查更个性化的方法,针对学生的障碍和临床特征进行干预。为了优化干预效果,应在设计中实现开发和评估,以便评估不同干预成分的增量价值和定制策略,例如多阶段优化设计。