• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证简短的图像唤起任务作为一般人群主观幸福感的指标。

Validation of a brief image elicitation task as an indicator of subjective wellbeing in the general population.

机构信息

Research and Development Department, Leading Indicator Systems, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 22;12:1435144. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1435144. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1435144
PMID:39502814
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11534616/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A novel image-based method (AgileBrain) demonstrates construct validity as a measure of wellbeing in the general working adult population.

METHOD

Analysis of data from four large nationally representative samples of American full-time workers employed by mid-to-large size companies conducted in November 2021 ( = 812), May 2022 ( = 810), June 2023 ( = 986), and January 2024 ( = 1,179).

RESULTS

Across all four studies, AgileBrain demonstrates convergent validity across multiple established indicators of subjective wellbeing including the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Neuroticism (BFI-S), UCLA Loneliness Scale, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Coping Styles (Brief COPE-28), self-reported diagnosed neurodiversity conditions and symptoms, and trauma history.

CONCLUSION

Results across these studies suggest that AgileBrain is useful as a screening tool for detecting compromised wellbeing in terms of construct validity. Given strong preferences for brief, gamified assessments, the validity advantages stemming from less consciously controllable responses, and the statistical advantages of measures associated with high response rates and normal distributions, AgileBrain emerges as strong tool for assessing subjective wellbeing at the population level and offers a promising approach to monitoring treatment effectiveness.

摘要

背景

一种新的基于图像的方法（AgileBrain）在一般成年工作人群中作为幸福感的衡量标准，表现出了结构有效性。

方法

对 2021 年 11 月（ = 812）、2022 年 5 月（ = 810）、2023 年 6 月（ = 986）和 2024 年 1 月（ = 1179）四个美国大型中型公司的全职员工的四个大型全国代表性样本的数据进行分析。

结果

在所有四项研究中，AgileBrain 在多个已确立的主观幸福感指标上表现出了收敛效度，包括患者健康问卷（PHQ-9）、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表（CESD-10）、广泛性焦虑障碍量表（GAD-7）、神经质（BFI-S）、加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表、感知压力量表（PSS-10）、应对方式（Brief COPE-28）、自我报告的诊断神经多样性状况和症状以及创伤史。

结论

这些研究的结果表明，AgileBrain 在结构有效性方面作为一种筛查工具来检测幸福感受损是有用的。鉴于对简短、游戏化评估的强烈偏好，较少受意识控制的反应所带来的有效性优势，以及与高响应率和正态分布相关的测量的统计优势，AgileBrain 成为评估人群水平主观幸福感的有力工具，并为监测治疗效果提供了一种有前途的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/303c3bd69f38/fpubh-12-1435144-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/8ccf4d2c9184/fpubh-12-1435144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/5534847ed528/fpubh-12-1435144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/59bb44fc7d5b/fpubh-12-1435144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/94aaf4917aae/fpubh-12-1435144-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/cd8cc19e02ca/fpubh-12-1435144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/37976b094398/fpubh-12-1435144-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/6da8634bcb6b/fpubh-12-1435144-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/c5ff81b81e18/fpubh-12-1435144-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/45b7d6ac1100/fpubh-12-1435144-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/41dbad17e8f8/fpubh-12-1435144-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/4d442e26ebb0/fpubh-12-1435144-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/f60fa37e3f99/fpubh-12-1435144-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/86905273e1b4/fpubh-12-1435144-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/303c3bd69f38/fpubh-12-1435144-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/8ccf4d2c9184/fpubh-12-1435144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/5534847ed528/fpubh-12-1435144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/59bb44fc7d5b/fpubh-12-1435144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/94aaf4917aae/fpubh-12-1435144-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/cd8cc19e02ca/fpubh-12-1435144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/37976b094398/fpubh-12-1435144-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/6da8634bcb6b/fpubh-12-1435144-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/c5ff81b81e18/fpubh-12-1435144-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/45b7d6ac1100/fpubh-12-1435144-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/41dbad17e8f8/fpubh-12-1435144-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/4d442e26ebb0/fpubh-12-1435144-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/f60fa37e3f99/fpubh-12-1435144-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/86905273e1b4/fpubh-12-1435144-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82fe/11534616/303c3bd69f38/fpubh-12-1435144-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a brief image elicitation task as an indicator of subjective wellbeing in the general population.验证简短的图像唤起任务作为一般人群主观幸福感的指标。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 22;12:1435144. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1435144. eCollection 2024.
2
Reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 scale and its subscales of depression and anxiety among US adults based on nativity.基于出生地的美国成年人患者健康问卷-4 量表及其抑郁和焦虑分量表的信度和效度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05665-8.
3
A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population.一个包含四项指标的抑郁和焦虑测量工具：一般人群中患者健康问卷-4（PHQ-4）的验证和标准化。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Apr;122(1-2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
4
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估：法国人群中简易应对方式问卷（Brief COPE）的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
5
Validation of the Sinhalese Version of Brief COPE Scale for patients with cancer in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡癌症患者简短应对方式量表僧伽罗语版的验证。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;10(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00863-z.
6
Psychometric properties of the ultra-brief self-report Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) to assess anxiety and depression in Arabic-speaking adults.超简短自评患者健康问卷-4（PHQ-4）用于评估阿拉伯语成年人焦虑和抑郁的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05978-8.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) over the course of the pandemic in a large German general population sample.大样本德国普通人群在疫情期间对简明韧性应对量表（BRCS）的心理测量学评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0309587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309587. eCollection 2024.
8
Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): performance in a clinical sample in relation to PHQ-9 and GAD-7.短式 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表（SWEMWBS）：与 PHQ-9 和 GAD-7 相关的临床样本中的表现。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 24;19(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01882-x.
9
Brief assessment of subjective health complaints: Development, validation and population norms of a brief form of the Giessen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-8).主观健康问题的简要评估：吉森主观症状清单简版（GBB - 8）的编制、验证及人群常模
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Apr;95:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
10
The heritability of mental health and wellbeing defined using COMPAS-W, a new composite measure of wellbeing.使用 COMPAS-W（一种新的幸福感综合衡量标准）定义的心理健康和幸福感的遗传性。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Sep 30;219(1):204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.033. Epub 2014 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional wellbeing in neurodivergent populations.神经发育障碍人群的情绪健康
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1606232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1606232. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The structure of human motivation.人类动机结构。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 6;11(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01346-5.
2
Employee Engagement as Human Motivation: Implications for Theory, Methods, and Practice.员工敬业度作为人类动机：对理论、方法和实践的启示。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Dec;57(4):1223-1255. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09737-w. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Theoretical and Empirical Foundations for a Unified Pyramid of Human Motivation.人类动机统一金字塔的理论和实证基础。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Jun;58(2):731-756. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09700-9. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
The predictors of adaptive and maladaptive coping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: The Protection Motivation Theory and the Big Five personality traits.在 COVID-19 大流行期间，适应性和不良应对行为的预测因素：保护动机理论和大五人格特质。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258606. eCollection 2021.
5
Symptoms of Anxiety or Depressive Disorder and Use of Mental Health Care Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, August 2020-February 2021.在 COVID-19 大流行期间成年人的焦虑或抑郁障碍症状和精神卫生保健使用情况-美国，2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 2 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Apr 2;70(13):490-494. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e2.
6
The psychometric validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) in first episode schizophrenia spectrum.首发精神分裂症谱系中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表（CES-D）的心理测量有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jun;252:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.023. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
7
Good stress, bad stress and very bad stress.良性压力、不良压力和极恶压力。
Stress. 2015;18(3):267-8. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2015.1087091.
8
Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing.大五人格短评估：除电话访谈外，在各种调查方法中均具有稳健性。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):548-67. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z.
9
Enter feelings: somatosensory responses following early stages of visual induction of emotion.进入感受：情绪视觉诱导早期阶段后的躯体感觉反应。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Apr;72(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.015. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
10
A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies.一种用于大规模调查中测量孤独感的简短量表：两项基于人群的研究结果。
Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.