• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与者信息手册中对参与者数据和生物样本的使用描述不足。

Use of participant data and biological samples is insufficiently described in participant information leaflets.

作者信息

McGrath Emer R, Kirby Nigel, Shiely Frances

机构信息

HRB Clinical Research Facility, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;177:111590. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111590. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111590
PMID:39505053
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With greater availability of participant data and biobank repositories following clinical trial completion, adequately describing future data and biological sample reuse plans to trial participants is increasingly important. We evaluated how trial teams currently describe current and future use of participant data and biological samples in participant information leaflets (PILs).

METHODS

Retrospective qualitative analysis of 240 PILs (182 clinical trials) in Ireland and the UK. Descriptions of data and sample use/reuse were extracted and analyzed using a 4-stage pragmatic content analysis approach. A recommended list of questions to be addressed by trial teams when designing PILs was developed.

RESULTS

Of the 240 included PILs, 85% specifically mentioned, or directly implied, how confidentiality of participant data would be maintained; 38% were considered by the authors to adequately describe how data confidentiality would be maintained (ie, the PIL specifically mentioned data deidentification and compliance with data protection regulations); 47% reported the intended duration of data storage (mean 15; SD ± 9 years); 40% specified if data would be used in future research studies and 28% stated if data would be shared with other researchers. Of the 117 PILs stating biological samples would be collected from participants, 80% provided a reason for requesting the sample, 66% stated whether stored samples would be deidentified, 21% specified if individual-level results would be made available to participants and 70% specified whether samples may be used for future studies. Of the 73 PILs specifying planned future sample storage, 18% stated the intended duration of storage and 48% specified if samples would be shared with other researchers. A list of 8 recommended questions to be addressed by trial teams when designing PILs were identified, for example, 'What is the intended duration of data and sample storage for the current study?'.

CONCLUSIONS

PILs often provide insufficient detail regarding plans for current use and future reuse of participants' data and their biological samples. The majority do not adequately describe plans for maintaining data confidentiality. Best practice approaches to describing data use and reuse in PILs are needed. This will require multistakeholder input, including potential trial participants to progress this.

摘要

背景

随着临床试验结束后参与者数据和生物样本库的可用性提高,向试验参与者充分描述未来的数据和生物样本再利用计划变得越来越重要。我们评估了试验团队目前如何在参与者信息手册(PIL)中描述参与者数据和生物样本的当前及未来用途。

方法

对爱尔兰和英国的240份PIL(182项临床试验)进行回顾性定性分析。使用四阶段实用内容分析方法提取并分析数据和样本使用/再利用的描述。制定了试验团队在设计PIL时应解决的推荐问题清单。

结果

在纳入的240份PIL中,85%特别提及或直接暗示了将如何维护参与者数据的保密性;作者认为38%充分描述了将如何维护数据保密性(即PIL特别提及数据去识别化以及遵守数据保护法规);47%报告了数据存储的预期时长(平均15年;标准差±9年);40%明确了数据是否会用于未来的研究,28%说明了数据是否会与其他研究人员共享。在117份表明将从参与者那里收集生物样本的PIL中,80%给出了索要样本的理由,66%说明了存储的样本是否会去识别化,21%明确了是否会向参与者提供个体层面的结果,70%明确了样本是否可用于未来研究。在73份明确了计划中未来样本存储情况的PIL中,18%说明了预期存储时长,48%明确了样本是否会与其他研究人员共享。确定了试验团队在设计PIL时应解决的8个推荐问题清单,例如,“当前研究中数据和样本存储的预期时长是多久?”

结论

PIL通常在参与者数据及其生物样本的当前使用和未来再利用计划方面提供的细节不足。大多数PIL没有充分描述维护数据保密性的计划。需要在PIL中描述数据使用和再利用的最佳实践方法。这将需要包括潜在试验参与者在内的多方利益相关者的投入,以推动此事的进展。

相似文献

1
Use of participant data and biological samples is insufficiently described in participant information leaflets.参与者信息手册中对参与者数据和生物样本的使用描述不足。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;177:111590. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111590. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Retention strategies are routinely communicated to potential trial participants but often differ from what was planned in the trial protocol: an analysis of adult participant information leaflets and their corresponding protocols.保留策略通常会传达给潜在的试验参与者,但往往与试验方案中计划的内容不同:对成年参与者信息传单及其相应方案的分析。
Trials. 2024 Jun 10;25(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08194-7.
3
When describing harms and benefits to potential trial participants, participant information leaflets are inadequate.在向潜在试验参与者描述危害和获益时,参与者信息单是不够的。
Trials. 2024 May 1;25(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08087-9.
4
Information about dissemination of trial results in patient information leaflets for clinicals trials in the UK and Ireland: The what and the when.关于英国和爱尔兰临床试验中患者信息传单中试验结果传播的信息:内容和时间。
PLoS One. 2022 May 24;17(5):e0268898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268898. eCollection 2022.
5
Trial participants' self-reported understanding of randomisation phrases in participation information leaflets can be high, but acceptability of some descriptions is low, especially those linked to gambling and luck.试验参与者对参与信息传单中随机分配短语的自我报告理解可能很高,但某些描述的可接受性较低,特别是那些与赌博和运气相关的描述。
Trials. 2024 Jun 18;25(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08217-3.
6
Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation.英国随机对照试验患者信息传单(PILs):一项探索其是否包含支持参与试验决策的信息的可行性研究。
Trials. 2014 Feb 18;15:62. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-62.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Relative importance of informational items in participant information leaflets for trials: a Q-methodology approach.试验参与者信息手册中信息项目的相对重要性:一种Q方法学途径
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 5;8(9):e023303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023303.
9
Nocebo effects and participant information leaflets: evaluating information provided on adverse effects in UK clinical trials.否定效应和参与者信息传单:评估英国临床试验中提供的不良反应信息。
Trials. 2020 Jul 17;21(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04591-w.
10
Does different information disclosure on placebo control affect blinding and trial outcomes? A case study of participant information leaflets of randomized placebo-controlled trials of acupuncture.不同的安慰剂对照信息披露是否会影响盲法和试验结果?一项基于针刺随机安慰剂对照试验参与者知情同意书的案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0474-1.