Oncology Day Ward, St. James's Hospital, James Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Trials Research and Methodologies Unit (TRAMS), HRB Clinical Research Facility and School of Public Health, 4th Floor Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Trials. 2024 May 1;25(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08087-9.
Providing informed consent for trials requires providing trial participants with comprehensive information about the trial, including information about potential risks and benefits. It is required by the ethical principle of respecting patient autonomy. Our study examines the variation in the way information about potential trial benefits and harms is shared in participant information leaflets (PILs).
A total of 214 PILs and informed consent forms from clinical trials units (CTUs) and Clinical Research Facilities (CRFs) in Ireland and the UK were assessed by two authors independently, to check the extent to which they adhered to seven recently developed principles. Discrepancies were resolved by a third.
Usage of the seven principles varied widely between PILs regardless of the intended recipient or trial type. None of the PILs used more than four principles, and some (4%) used none. Twenty-seven per cent of PILs presented information about all known potential harms, whereas 45% presented information on all known potential benefits. Some PILs did not provide any potential harms or potential benefits (8%). There was variation in the information contained in adult and children PILs and across disease areas.
Significant variation exists in how potential trial benefits and harms are described to potential trial participants in PILs in our sample. Usage of the seven principles of good practice will promote consistency, ensure informed ethical decision-making and invoke trust and transparency. In the long term, a standardised PIL template is needed.
提供试验知情同意书需要向试验参与者提供有关试验的全面信息,包括有关潜在风险和获益的信息。这是尊重患者自主权的伦理原则所要求的。我们的研究考察了参与者知情同意书中(PIL)关于潜在试验获益和风险信息的分享方式的变化。
我们对来自爱尔兰和英国的临床试验单位(CTU)和临床研究机构(CRF)的 214 份 PIL 和知情同意书进行了两位作者的独立评估,以检查它们在多大程度上符合最近制定的七项原则。分歧由第三位作者解决。
PIL 之间的七个原则的使用情况差异很大,无论其预期接收者或试验类型如何。没有一份 PIL 使用了超过四项原则,有些(4%)则一项都没有使用。27%的 PIL 提供了所有已知潜在危害的信息,而 45%的 PIL 提供了所有已知潜在获益的信息。一些 PIL 没有提供任何潜在的危害或潜在的获益(8%)。成人和儿童 PIL 以及疾病领域之间的信息内容存在差异。
在我们的样本中,PIL 中向潜在试验参与者描述潜在试验获益和风险的方式存在显著差异。七项良好实践原则的使用将促进一致性,确保知情的伦理决策,并激发信任和透明度。从长远来看,需要一个标准化的 PIL 模板。