Vacaru Stefania V, Lau Lok-Pui, Frederiks Kyra, Sterkenburg Paula S, Barakova Emilia
Department of Clinical Child and Family Studies & Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, New York University - Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Adv Robot. 2024 Jul 11;38(19-20):1364-1377. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2024.2369797. eCollection 2024.
While social robots show promise for therapeutic interventions, accurate assessments of (vulnerable) participants' affective outcomes require attention. The careful selection of devices for recording autonomic processes in response to stress-inducing and relaxing exercises is essential to ensure data quality recordings and participants' comfort. This foundational study assessed two commonly utilized devices to record electrodermal activity (EDA), indexed through skin conductance, concerning their sensitivity to stress-relaxation manipulations and social validity during a robot intervention: a sock with a Shimmer device and a wrist-worn Empatica E4. We aimed to select the most sensitive and easy-to-wear one as a precursor to a larger intervention study featuring mindfulness-based relaxation exercises delivered by an NAO robot. The findings, based on 28 healthy Dutch-speaking adult volunteers wearing both devices, revealed sensitivity in detecting EDA variations in arousal following stressful (increase) and Robot-delivered mindfulness-based relaxation (decrease) exercises, further corroborated by self-reports. Bland-Altman results suggested little agreement between the two devices and lower sensitivity for the Empatica E4. No statistically significant differences concerning wearing comfort between the Empatica E4 and the Shimmer devices emerged. Although both devices independently showed sensitivity to stress/relaxation manipulation, the choice for one or the other should be informed by the activities in the intervention.
虽然社交机器人在治疗干预方面显示出前景,但准确评估(易受伤害的)参与者的情感结果需要予以关注。仔细选择用于记录自主过程以应对压力诱导和放松练习的设备,对于确保数据质量记录和参与者的舒适度至关重要。这项基础研究评估了两种常用的记录皮肤电活动(EDA)的设备,通过皮肤电导来索引,考察它们在机器人干预期间对压力放松操作的敏感性和社会效度:一种带有Shimmer设备的袜子和一款腕戴式的Empatica E4。我们旨在选择最敏感且易于佩戴的设备,作为一项更大规模干预研究的前期准备,该研究将采用由NAO机器人进行的基于正念的放松练习。基于28名佩戴这两种设备的荷兰语健康成年志愿者的研究结果显示,在检测压力(增加)和机器人引导的基于正念的放松(减少)练习后唤醒过程中的EDA变化方面具有敏感性,自我报告进一步证实了这一点。布兰德 - 奥特曼分析结果表明这两种设备之间一致性较差,且Empatica E4的敏感性较低。在Empatica E4和Shimmer设备之间,未出现关于佩戴舒适度的统计学显著差异。尽管这两种设备都独立显示出对压力/放松操作的敏感性,但在干预中选择使用哪种设备应根据活动情况来决定。