Baldassarre Brian, Calabretta Giulia, Karpen Ingo Oswald, Bocken Nancy, Hultink Erik Jan
Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
School of Business and Economics, Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Bus Ethics. 2024;195(1):25-46. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05600-z. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
In the 1960s, influential thinkers defined design as a rational problem-solving approach to deal with the challenges of sustainable human development. In 2009, a design consultant and a business academic selected some of these ideas and successfully branded them with the term "design thinking." As a result, design thinking has developed into a stream of innovation management research discussing how to innovate faster and better in competitive markets. This article aims to foster a reconsideration of the purposes of design thinking moving forward, in view of the sustainable development challenges intertwined with accelerating innovation in a perpetual economic growth paradigm. To this end, we use a problematization method to challenge innovation management research on design thinking. As part of this method, we first systematically collect and critically analyze the articles in this research stream. We uncover a prominent focus on economic impact, while social and environmental impacts remain largely neglected. To overcome this critical limitation, we integrate design thinking with responsible innovation theorizing. We develop a framework for responsible design thinking, explaining how to apply this approach beyond a private interest and competitive advantage logic, to address sustainable development challenges, such as climate change, resource depletion, poverty, and injustice. The framework contributes to strengthening the practical relevance of design thinking and its theoretical foundations. To catalyze this effort, we propose an agenda for future research.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10551-023-05600-z.
在20世纪60年代,有影响力的思想家将设计定义为一种理性的解决问题的方法,以应对人类可持续发展的挑战。2009年,一位设计顾问和一位商业学者挑选了其中一些理念,并成功地将它们用“设计思维”这一术语进行了品牌化。结果,设计思维已发展成为创新管理研究的一个分支,讨论如何在竞争激烈的市场中更快、更好地进行创新。鉴于在持续经济增长范式下加速创新与可持续发展挑战相互交织,本文旨在促使人们对设计思维未来的目的进行重新思考。为此,我们使用一种问题化方法来挑战关于设计思维的创新管理研究。作为该方法的一部分,我们首先系统地收集并批判性地分析该研究领域的文章。我们发现其中显著侧重于经济影响,而社会和环境影响在很大程度上被忽视了。为克服这一关键局限性,我们将设计思维与负责任创新理论相结合。我们开发了一个负责任设计思维的框架,解释如何超越私人利益和竞争优势逻辑来应用这种方法,以应对诸如气候变化、资源枯竭、贫困和不公正等可持续发展挑战。该框架有助于增强设计思维的实践相关性及其理论基础。为推动这一努力,我们提出了一个未来研究议程。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10551-023-05600-z获取的补充材料。