Stals Yolandi, du Plessis Edwin, Pretorius Paul J, Nel Mariette, Boateng Alexander
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2024 Oct 9;30:2307. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2307. eCollection 2024.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed the psychological functioning of mental healthcare practitioners under severe strain. Coping methods may affect mental health outcomes.
The study examined the relationship between depression, anxiety, stress, and coping styles utilised by mental healthcare practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Three private and one public mental healthcare facility in Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Respondents completed the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief-COPE) inventories. An ordinal regression model was used to assess the relationship between coping styles, anxiety and depression.
A total of 212 practitioners were included in the analysis. According to DASS-21 measures, approximately 41% and 28% of respondents had moderate to severe depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively, with the highest prevalence among younger female respondents and nurses. The association between stress severity, anxiety and depression was significant. Avoidant coping methods and two approach coping strategies (planning and acceptance) were associated with depression and anxiety. Anxiety was linked to an increased likelihood of transitioning to higher avoidant categories, while participants with depression were less likely to move to higher avoidant or approach categories.
Mental healthcare practitioners, especially nurses, experienced significant COVID-19-related psychological distress during the pandemic. Avoidant coping mechanisms may increase the risk of poor mental health outcomes.
This study added data on the mental health effects of COVID-19 on mental healthcare practitioners, as well as psychological methods used to cope during the pandemic.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行使精神卫生保健从业者的心理功能承受了巨大压力。应对方式可能会影响心理健康结果。
本研究探讨了精神卫生保健从业者在COVID-19大流行期间所采用的抑郁、焦虑、压力与应对方式之间的关系。
南非布隆方丹的三家私立和一家公立精神卫生保健机构。
受访者完成了抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)以及经历问题的简要应对取向(Brief-COPE)量表。采用有序回归模型评估应对方式、焦虑和抑郁之间的关系。
共有212名从业者纳入分析。根据DASS-21测量结果,分别约有41%和28%的受访者有中度至重度抑郁和焦虑症状,在年轻女性受访者和护士中患病率最高。压力严重程度、焦虑和抑郁之间的关联显著。回避应对方式以及两种积极应对策略(计划和接受)与抑郁和焦虑有关。焦虑与转向更高回避类别的可能性增加有关,而患有抑郁症的参与者转向更高回避或积极类别可能性较小。
精神卫生保健从业者,尤其是护士,在大流行期间经历了与COVID-19相关的显著心理困扰。回避应对机制可能会增加心理健康不良结果的风险。
本研究补充了关于COVID-19对精神卫生保健从业者心理健康影响的数据,以及大流行期间用于应对的心理方法。