University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, Bamberg, Germany.
Assessment. 2023 Mar;30(2):287-301. doi: 10.1177/10731911211052483. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
The Brief COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced) is a frequently used questionnaire assessing 14 theoretically derived coping mechanisms, but psychometric research has suggested inconsistent results concerning its factor structure. The aim of this study was to investigate primary and secondary order factor structures of the Brief COPE during the COVID-19 pandemic by testing 11 different models by confirmatory factor analyses and to assess differences between sex, age groups, and relationship status. Altogether, 529 respondents from Austria and Germany participated in a web-based survey. Results supported the originally hypothesized 14-factor structure but did not support previously described higher-order structures. However, bass-ackwards analyses suggested systematic overlap between different factors, which might have contributed to different factor solutions in previous research. Measurement invariance across sex, age groups, and relationship status could be confirmed. Findings suggest that cultural and situational aspects as well as the functional level should be considered in research on theoretical framing of coping behavior.
《Brief COPE(应对经验取向问卷)》是一种常用的问卷,用于评估 14 种理论上推导的应对机制,但心理测量学研究表明其因子结构的结果不一致。本研究的目的是通过验证性因子分析测试 11 种不同的模型,探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间《Brief COPE》的主成分和次成分结构,并评估性别、年龄组和关系状况之间的差异。共有来自奥地利和德国的 529 名受访者参加了这项网络调查。结果支持最初假设的 14 因素结构,但不支持先前描述的高阶结构。然而,反向分析表明不同因素之间存在系统性重叠,这可能导致先前研究中的不同因素解决方案。可以确认性别、年龄组和关系状况的测量不变性。研究结果表明,在应对行为的理论框架研究中,应考虑文化和情境方面以及功能水平。