Department of Communication Sciences and Sociology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Cam. del Molino, 5, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942, Spain.
ESAI Business School, Espiritu Santo University, Av. Samborondón 5, Samborondón, Guayaquil, 092301, Ecuador.
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 9;12(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02140-7.
This study aims to conduct a literature review and meta-analysis on the use of Happiness Management strategies in internal communication. The objective was to extract theoretical constructs of dimensions and indicators for the development of a guide for its application, validated by a panel of experts.
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed under the protocol of the PRISMA Extension Guide of articles indexed in the Scopus database (2019-2024). The total number of extracted documents (n = 479) was screened based on the inclusion criteria, and the sample was delimited by 49 studies. Subsequently, after reading and analyzing the research, the dimensions and indicators of internal communication from a Happiness Management perspective were clustered. This guide was submitted to a panel of 13 experts who determined the reliability and validity of the construct and content using the Content Validity Index (CVI).
The dimensions and indicators emerging from the literature were validated with an average ( ) of 3.36/4, achieving a level of inter-judge agreement (CVI) of 0.86, an excellent agreement of 86%, and an average score of 2.90/4 (high). The guide was composed of 9 dimensions of internal communication: Attitudes of the leader, employer or supervisor, Climate and communication policies, Feedback and recognition, Organizational environment and structures, Peer and informal communication, Organizational culture and business perspective, Employee-organization relationship, Communication media and platforms, and Employee attitudes, which brought together 103 variables. These dimensions were then reorganized into the three macro-dimensions of the Happiness Management philosophy: (1) active construction of a healthy work environment and well-being, (2) formation of employees' positive personality, and (3) active emotional experience during the working day to build the internal communication development guide from the Happiness Management perspective.
Integrating Happiness Management into internal communication can significantly enhance employee well-being and organizational effectiveness. The validated framework provides a detailed guide for aligning internal communication strategies with the Happiness Management principles.
本研究旨在对内部沟通中幸福管理策略的应用进行文献回顾和荟萃分析。目的是提取维度的理论结构和指标,为其应用开发指南,并由专家组进行验证。
根据 Scopus 数据库中索引文章的 PRISMA 扩展指南的协议(2019-2024 年)进行系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析。根据纳入标准筛选出提取的文献总数(n=479),并将样本限定为 49 项研究。然后,在阅读和分析研究后,从幸福管理的角度对内部沟通的维度和指标进行聚类。该指南提交给了一个由 13 名专家组成的小组,他们使用内容有效性指数(CVI)来确定构建和内容的可靠性和有效性。
文献中出现的维度和指标得到了验证,平均( )为 3.36/4,达到了 0.86 的裁判间一致性(CVI)水平,极好的 86%一致性,以及 2.90/4 的平均分数(高)。该指南由内部沟通的 9 个维度组成:领导、雇主或主管的态度、气候和沟通政策、反馈和认可、组织环境和结构、同事和非正式沟通、组织文化和业务视角、员工-组织关系、沟通媒体和平台以及员工态度,共汇集了 103 个变量。这些维度随后被重新组织到幸福管理哲学的三个宏观维度中:(1)积极构建健康的工作环境和幸福感,(2)形成员工的积极人格,(3)在工作日积极体验情绪,从幸福管理的角度构建内部沟通发展指南。
将幸福管理融入内部沟通可以显著提高员工的幸福感和组织的有效性。验证后的框架为与幸福管理原则保持一致的内部沟通策略提供了详细的指导。