Mainey Lydia, Richardson Sarah, Essex Ryan, Dillard-Wright Jessica
CQUniversity.
University of Essex.
Nurs Ethics. 2025 May;32(3):980-993. doi: 10.1177/09697330241299525. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
Advocacy and activism are dynamic terms representing a spectrum of political action, aiming to achieve social or political change. The extent to which nursing advocacy and activism are legitimate nursing roles has been debated for around 50 years. Nursing regulatory documents, such as codes of conduct and professional standards, may provide direction to nurses on how they should act in the context of advocacy and activism. To explore what regulatory documents say about advocacy and activism, either explicitly or implicitly, and how they shape advocacy and activism. We used a Reflexive Qualitative Document Analysis approach with a Critical Feminist lens to analyse contemporary nursing regulatory documents from the USA, UK and Australia. This article has no human participants, and informed consent was not required. We identified eight nursing regulatory documents from the American Nurses Association, Nursing and Midwifery Council and Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. We constructed two major themes that reveal how nursing advocacy and activism are conceived and shaped in regulatory documents. Theme 1, describes the gendered and neoliberal subtexts influencing advocacy and activism. Theme 2, , describes the shape of advocacy and activism in the regulatory documents. Regulatory documents from the USA, UK and Australia support diplomatic nursing advocacy and activism for people, equity, ourselves (nurses), the profession and systems change. However, more oppositional and disruptive advocacy and activism are potentially constrained by gendered and neoliberal subtexts that depoliticise nurses' roles.
倡导和行动主义是代表一系列政治行动的动态术语,旨在实现社会或政治变革。护理倡导和行动主义在多大程度上属于合理的护理角色,这一问题已经争论了约50年。护理监管文件,如行为准则和专业标准,可能会为护士在倡导和行动主义背景下应如何行动提供指导。为了探究监管文件对倡导和行动主义是如何明确或隐含表述的,以及它们如何塑造倡导和行动主义。我们采用了带有批判女性主义视角的反思性定性文件分析方法,来分析来自美国、英国和澳大利亚的当代护理监管文件。本文没有涉及人类参与者,也无需知情同意。我们从美国护士协会、护理与助产士理事会以及澳大利亚护理与助产士委员会中确定了八份护理监管文件。我们构建了两个主要主题,揭示了护理倡导和行动主义在监管文件中是如何被构想和塑造的。主题1描述了影响倡导和行动主义的性别化和新自由主义潜台词。主题2描述了监管文件中倡导和行动主义的形式。来自美国、英国和澳大利亚的监管文件支持为民众、公平、我们自己(护士)、职业和系统变革而进行的外交性护理倡导和行动主义。然而,更多具有对抗性和颠覆性的倡导和行动主义可能会受到使护士角色非政治化的性别化和新自由主义潜台词的限制。