Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Centre for Paediatrics Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 14;32(12):789. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08981-7.
Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are essential to improve the well-being and neurocognitive outcomes of pediatric cancer patients; however, considerable barriers hamper the implementation of these tools. The present study assessed health care professionals' (HCP) perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a specific EBI for pediatric oncology in a standardized manner to define effective solutions and practical recommendations.
An adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) questionnaire was applied to inquire n = 31 HCPs in pediatric oncology about the five domains of implementation.
While most 'intervention characteristics' were considered beneficial for implementation, various aspects of the 'inner' and 'outer setting' were considered problematic. The most prevalent barriers included a shortage in resources, poor integration of EBIs into policies and lacking incentives such as user benefits. Concrete proposed and realized steps to facilitate effective implementation include a patient-focused design and continuous evaluation and adaption of the tool, a detailed EBI user manual and application workshops, as well as regular interdisciplinary meetings to improve communication. Regarding the internal and external settings, involving policy makers, establishing psychosocial care in the insurance system and increasing awareness by sharing evidence are essential steps for improved implementation.
Based on standardized implementation evaluation, various targeted actions could be defined and implemented to facilitate successful implementation of EBIs in pediatric oncology. The results emphasize that psychosocial care must become an integral part of treatment standards and public health policies to ensure that effective psychosocial interventions for improved wellbeing and neurocognitive skills successfully reach pediatric cancer patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04474678 (July 17th 2020).
循证干预措施(EBIs)对于改善儿科癌症患者的健康和神经认知结果至关重要;然而,许多障碍阻碍了这些工具的实施。本研究以标准化的方式评估了医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对儿科肿瘤特定 EBI 实施的感知障碍和促进因素,以确定有效的解决方案和实际建议。
采用改良版的实施研究综合框架(CFIR)问卷,调查了儿科肿瘤学中的 31 名 HCP,询问了他们对实施的五个领域的看法。
虽然大多数“干预特征”被认为对实施有益,但“内部”和“外部环境”的各个方面都被认为存在问题。最常见的障碍包括资源短缺、将 EBI 纳入政策的整合不足以及缺乏用户受益等激励措施。具体提出并实施的促进有效实施的步骤包括以患者为中心的设计和对工具的持续评估和调整、详细的 EBI 用户手册和应用研讨会,以及定期的跨学科会议以改善沟通。就内部和外部环境而言,让政策制定者参与、在保险系统中建立心理社会保健以及通过分享证据提高认识是改善实施的必要步骤。
基于标准化的实施评估,可以确定和实施各种有针对性的行动,以促进儿科肿瘤学中 EBIs 的成功实施。研究结果强调,心理社会保健必须成为治疗标准和公共卫生政策的一个组成部分,以确保有效的心理社会干预措施能够改善患者的幸福感和神经认知技能,从而惠及儿科癌症患者。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04474678(2020 年 7 月 17 日)。