Suppr超能文献

腹带对腹侧疝修补术后结局的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of an abdominal binder on postoperative outcomes after ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Centro Universitário de Anápolis, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil.

State University of Maringa, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03193-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal binders consist of a wide compression belt that encircles the abdomen, theoretically supporting the abdominal wall. However, their use after ventral hernia repair is debated. Therefore, this meta-analysis evaluates their efficacy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of abdominal binders after ventral hernia repair. Outcomes included postoperative pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), surgical site infection (SSI), seroma formation and size, general well-being, activity limitation, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), and a 6-min walk test. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4.1 using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included five RCTs encompassing 297 patients. Overall analysis showed decreased SSI rates (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.59; p = 0.003; I = 0%) and reduced pain two weeks after surgery (MD -0.89; 95% CI -1.41 to -0.37; p = 0.0008; I = 0%) using abdominal binders. For patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair, it also demonstrated reduced SSI, pain four weeks after surgery (MD -0.60; 95% CI -0.88 to -0.32; p < 0.0001; I = 66%) and increased 6-min walk test performance four weeks after the procedure (MD 32.78 m; 95% CI 15.28 to 50.29 m; p = 0.0002; I = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal binders may decrease SSI, postoperative pain, and increase physical condition, particularly in open ventral hernia repair. Further studies are still required to evaluate the role of abdominal binders in minimally invasive techniques.

摘要

简介

腹部束带由环绕腹部的宽压缩带组成,理论上支撑腹壁。然而,它们在腹疝修补术后的使用仍存在争议。因此,本荟萃分析评估了它们的疗效。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 中搜索了比较腹疝修补术后使用腹部束带效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。结局包括术后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛、手术部位感染(SSI)、血清肿形成和大小、整体健康状况、活动受限、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和 6 分钟步行试验。使用 Review Manager 5.4.1 进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型。

结果

我们纳入了 5 项 RCT,共 297 名患者。总体分析显示,使用腹部束带可降低 SSI 发生率(RR 0.21;95%CI 0.07 至 0.59;p=0.003;I=0%)和术后两周疼痛程度(MD-0.89;95%CI-1.41 至-0.37;p=0.0008;I=0%)。对于接受开放式腹疝修补术的患者,还可降低 SSI、术后四周疼痛(MD-0.60;95%CI-0.88 至-0.32;p<0.0001;I=66%)和术后四周 6 分钟步行试验表现(MD 32.78 m;95%CI 15.28 至 50.29 m;p=0.0002;I=0%)。

结论

腹部束带可能减少 SSI、术后疼痛并改善身体状况,尤其是在开放式腹疝修补术中。仍需要进一步研究来评估腹部束带在微创技术中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验