• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹带对腹侧疝修补术后结局的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of an abdominal binder on postoperative outcomes after ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Centro Universitário de Anápolis, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil.

State University of Maringa, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03193-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03193-8
PMID:39550494
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal binders consist of a wide compression belt that encircles the abdomen, theoretically supporting the abdominal wall. However, their use after ventral hernia repair is debated. Therefore, this meta-analysis evaluates their efficacy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of abdominal binders after ventral hernia repair. Outcomes included postoperative pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), surgical site infection (SSI), seroma formation and size, general well-being, activity limitation, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), and a 6-min walk test. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4.1 using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included five RCTs encompassing 297 patients. Overall analysis showed decreased SSI rates (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.59; p = 0.003; I = 0%) and reduced pain two weeks after surgery (MD -0.89; 95% CI -1.41 to -0.37; p = 0.0008; I = 0%) using abdominal binders. For patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair, it also demonstrated reduced SSI, pain four weeks after surgery (MD -0.60; 95% CI -0.88 to -0.32; p < 0.0001; I = 66%) and increased 6-min walk test performance four weeks after the procedure (MD 32.78 m; 95% CI 15.28 to 50.29 m; p = 0.0002; I = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal binders may decrease SSI, postoperative pain, and increase physical condition, particularly in open ventral hernia repair. Further studies are still required to evaluate the role of abdominal binders in minimally invasive techniques.

摘要

简介

腹部束带由环绕腹部的宽压缩带组成,理论上支撑腹壁。然而,它们在腹疝修补术后的使用仍存在争议。因此,本荟萃分析评估了它们的疗效。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 中搜索了比较腹疝修补术后使用腹部束带效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。结局包括术后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛、手术部位感染(SSI)、血清肿形成和大小、整体健康状况、活动受限、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和 6 分钟步行试验。使用 Review Manager 5.4.1 进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型。

结果

我们纳入了 5 项 RCT,共 297 名患者。总体分析显示,使用腹部束带可降低 SSI 发生率(RR 0.21;95%CI 0.07 至 0.59;p=0.003;I=0%)和术后两周疼痛程度(MD-0.89;95%CI-1.41 至-0.37;p=0.0008;I=0%)。对于接受开放式腹疝修补术的患者,还可降低 SSI、术后四周疼痛(MD-0.60;95%CI-0.88 至-0.32;p<0.0001;I=66%)和术后四周 6 分钟步行试验表现(MD 32.78 m;95%CI 15.28 至 50.29 m;p=0.0002;I=0%)。

结论

腹部束带可能减少 SSI、术后疼痛并改善身体状况,尤其是在开放式腹疝修补术中。仍需要进一步研究来评估腹部束带在微创技术中的作用。

相似文献

1
Effect of an abdominal binder on postoperative outcomes after ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹带对腹侧疝修补术后结局的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03193-8.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
5
Association between surgical hernia repair techniques and the incidence of seroma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.手术疝修补技术与血清肿发生率之间的关联:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02531-4. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
6
The impact of simultaneous panniculectomy in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同期行腹侧疝修补术对腹茧症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2125-2136. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03149-y. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
7
Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.预防接受心脏手术的成人手术部位感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 2;12(12):CD013332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013332.pub2.
8
Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.腔内灌洗和伤口冲洗预防手术部位感染
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2.
9
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中,使用胶水与缝线进行补片固定对慢性疼痛和复发的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.
10
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of sex on ventral hernia repair outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.性别对腹疝修补术结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2023 Sep;226(3):385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.06.026. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
4
Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range.从样本量、中位数、中值范围和/或四分位数范围中最优地估计样本均值。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1785-1805. doi: 10.1177/0962280216669183. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
5
Adverse Events after Ventral Hernia Repair: The Vicious Cycle of Complications.腹壁疝修补术后不良事件:并发症的恶性循环。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 9.
6
Trends in opioid analgesic abuse and mortality in the United States.美国阿片类镇痛药滥用和死亡率的趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 15;372(3):241-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406143.
7
Randomized clinical trial on the postoperative use of an abdominal binder after laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.腹腔镜脐疝和上腹部疝修补术后使用腹部束带的随机临床试验。
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1289-6. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
8
Evolution of heterogeneity (I2) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals in large meta-analyses.大型荟萃分析中异质性 (I2) 估计值及其 95%置信区间的演变。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039471. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
9
Effect of abdominal binders on pulmonary mechanics with implications for the military surgical population.腹部约束带对肺部力学的影响及其对军事手术人群的意义。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;69(1):34-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
10
The effect of abdominal support on functional outcomes in patients following major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.腹部支撑对腹部大手术后患者功能结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Physiother Can. 2010 Summer;62(3):242-53. doi: 10.3138/physio.62.3.242. Epub 2010 Jul 23.