• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三合一:整合三种相互竞争的理论模型(计划行为理论、价值-信念-规范理论和政策行动诊断模型)以解释应对气候变化的行动意图/行动。

One in three or three in one: Integrating three competing theoretical models (TPB, VIP, and PADM) to explain the intentions to act/actions against climate change.

作者信息

Kim Miri, Kim Seoyong, Jeon Sehyeok

机构信息

Social Science Research Institute, Ajou University, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.

Department of Public Administration, Ajou University, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Oct 19;10(21):e39337. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39337. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39337
PMID:39553624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565018/
Abstract

This study examines multidimensional factors affecting climate change response behavior. It constructs an integrated model based on the theory of planned behavior, value-identity-personal norms model, and protective action decision model, as a single theory cannot capture the complex nature of human behavior. Recent studies have shown that integrating theories include various influencing factors and indicate higher explanatory power. Therefore, this study uses an integrated model to identify multidimensional influencing factors. The fit of the integrated model was confirmed to be excellent (Chi-square = 1271.866, p = .000, GFI = 0.930, NFI = 0.940, RMSEA = 0.060, TLI = 0.937, SRMR = 0.059), and identity exhibited the greatest effect on personal norms, followed by intention on behavior. The integrated model suggests the following path: ecological value → identity → personal norms → stakeholder awareness → intention → behavior and then ecological value → identity → perceived behavioral control → risk awareness → intention → behavior. The results of the integrated model suggest that a multifaceted approach is necessary to promote climate change response behavior. Various factors, such as ecological value, identity, personal norms, stakeholder awareness, perceived behavioral control, and risk awareness, interact and influence behavior. Policies and programs that comprehensively consider these factors should be established.

摘要

本研究考察了影响气候变化应对行为的多维度因素。由于单一理论无法涵盖人类行为的复杂性,因此基于计划行为理论、价值认同 - 个人规范模型和保护行动决策模型构建了一个综合模型。近期研究表明,整合多种理论能纳入各种影响因素,并具有更高的解释力。因此,本研究使用综合模型来识别多维度影响因素。经确认,该综合模型的拟合度极佳(卡方 = 1271.866,p = 0.000,GFI = 0.930,NFI = 0.940,RMSEA = 0.060,TLI = 0.937,SRMR = 0.059),其中认同对个人规范的影响最大,其次是意图对行为的影响。综合模型表明了以下路径:生态价值→认同→个人规范→利益相关者意识→意图→行为,以及生态价值→认同→感知行为控制→风险意识→意图→行为。综合模型的结果表明,促进气候变化应对行为需要采取多方面的方法。生态价值、认同、个人规范、利益相关者意识、感知行为控制和风险意识等各种因素相互作用并影响行为。应制定全面考虑这些因素的政策和计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/2db156256670/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/beea0f20da20/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/ae31f08f90be/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/868b80d3af57/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/4b07467f6d18/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/2db156256670/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/beea0f20da20/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/ae31f08f90be/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/868b80d3af57/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/4b07467f6d18/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b2/11565018/2db156256670/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
One in three or three in one: Integrating three competing theoretical models (TPB, VIP, and PADM) to explain the intentions to act/actions against climate change.三合一:整合三种相互竞争的理论模型(计划行为理论、价值-信念-规范理论和政策行动诊断模型)以解释应对气候变化的行动意图/行动。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 19;10(21):e39337. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39337. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Self-Identity Matters: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Decode Tourists' Waste Sorting Intentions.自我认同很重要:计划行为理论的扩展对解码游客垃圾分类意愿的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065099.
3
Analysis of factors influencing family farms' adoption of green prevention and control techniques on an integrative framework of the TPB and NAM.基于 TPB 和 NAM 的整合框架分析影响家庭农场采用绿色防控技术的因素。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jul;247:104314. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104314. Epub 2024 May 18.
4
Predicting Australian adults' sun-safe behaviour: examining the role of personal and social norms.预测澳大利亚成年人的防晒行为:检验个人和社会规范的作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 May;20(2):396-412. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12108. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
Low Carbon Sustainable Diet Choices-An Analysis of the Driving Factors behind Plant-Based Egg Purchasing Behavior.低碳可持续饮食选择——植物基蛋品购买行为背后的驱动因素分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 7;16(16):2604. doi: 10.3390/nu16162604.
6
Predicting perceived exclusive breastfeeding behavior among higher education female students in Saudi Arabia: Application of the theory of planned behavior using structural equation modeling.预测沙特阿拉伯高校女学生感知的纯母乳喂养行为:使用结构方程模型的计划行为理论的应用。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2023 May;27(5):58-71. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i5.6.
7
Explaining consumers' intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behavior.解释中国青岛消费者购买绿色食品的意图:计划行为理论的修正与扩展。
Appetite. 2019 Feb 1;133:414-422. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
8
The relationships between the multidimensional planned behavior model, green brand awareness, green marketing activities, and purchase intention.多维计划行为模型、绿色品牌意识、绿色营销活动与购买意向之间的关系。
Brain Behav. 2024 Jun;14(6):e3584. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3584.
9
Understanding aberrant driving intentions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: Literature review and Meta-Analysis.基于计划行为理论理解异常驾驶意图:文献综述与元分析。
J Safety Res. 2024 Sep;90:225-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 31.
10
Using an Integrated Social Cognition Model to Explain Green Purchasing Behavior among Adolescents.利用综合社会认知模型解释青少年的绿色购买行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;18(23):12663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312663.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling Predictors of Medication Waste Reduction Intention in Algeria: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.建模预测阿尔及利亚减少药物浪费的意图:扩展计划行为理论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;20(16):6584. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166584.
2
Factors influencing protective behavior in the post-COVID-19 period in China: a cross-sectional study.影响中国 COVID-19 后保护行为的因素:一项横断面研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Sep 23;26(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-01015-2.
3
Why Do Consumers Intend to Purchase Natural Food? Integrating Theory of Planned Behavior, Value-Belief-Norm Theory, and Trust.
消费者为什么打算购买天然食品?整合计划行为理论、价值信念规范理论和信任。
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 1;13(6):1904. doi: 10.3390/nu13061904.
4
Exploring the Determinants of Perceived Risk of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in Korea.探究韩国民众对中东呼吸综合征(MERS)感知风险的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 4;15(6):1168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061168.
5
Risk Communication Emergency Response Preparedness: Contextual Assessment of the Protective Action Decision Model.风险沟通应急准备:防护行动决策模型的情境评估。
Risk Anal. 2018 Feb;38(2):333-344. doi: 10.1111/risa.12845. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Efficacy and the strength of evidence of U.S. alcohol control policies.美国酒精控制政策的效果和证据强度。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.008.
7
The risk perception paradox--implications for governance and communication of natural hazards.风险感知悖论——对自然灾害治理和沟通的启示。
Risk Anal. 2013 Jun;33(6):1049-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
8
The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence.保护行动决策模型:理论修正与额外证据。
Risk Anal. 2012 Apr;32(4):616-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
9
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
10
Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior.动机性决策:价值观的激活与自我中心性对选择和行为的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Mar;82(3):434-47. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.434.