Al-Kenane Khalida, Boy Frederic, Alsaber Ahmad, Nafea Rania, AlMutairi Shihanah
Business School, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Mubarak Al-Abdullah, Kuwait.
Zienkiewicz Institute for AI, Data & Modelling & NAIADES Research Network School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 1;15:1442303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1442303. eCollection 2024.
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in online searches related to psychological distress. Governments worldwide have responded with various measures to mitigate the impact of the virus, influencing public behavior and emotional well-being. This study investigated the relationship between government actions and public reactions in terms of online search behaviors, particularly concerning psychological distress during the pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to analyze how changes in government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced public expressions of psychological distress, as reflected in the volume of related online searches in Kuwait.
Utilizing Google Trends data, the study analyzed search frequencies for terms associated with psychological distress such as "anxiety" and "lockdown." The analysis correlated these search trends with government actions using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). The study period covered March 1, 2020, to October 10, 2020, and involved extensive data collection and analysis using custom software in R programming.
There was a significant correlation between the stringency of government-imposed restrictions and the volume of online searches related to psychological distress. Increased searches for "lockdown" coincided with heightened government restrictions and were associated with increased searches for "anxiety," suggesting that policy measures significantly impacted public psychological distress.
The study concludes that governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, measured through OxCGRT, have a measurable impact on public psychological distress, as evidenced by online search behaviors. This underscores the importance of considering psychological impacts in policymaking and suggests further research to explore this dynamic comprehensively. Future studies should focus on refining the correlation between specific types of policy measures and different expressions of psychological distress to better inform public health strategies and interventions.
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致与心理困扰相关的在线搜索量急剧增加。世界各国政府已采取各种措施来减轻病毒的影响,这影响了公众行为和情绪健康。本研究调查了政府行动与公众在在线搜索行为方面的反应之间的关系,特别是关于大流行期间的心理困扰。本研究的主要目的是分析COVID-19大流行期间政府政策的变化如何影响公众对心理困扰的表达,这在科威特相关在线搜索量中得到体现。
该研究利用谷歌趋势数据,分析了与心理困扰相关的词汇(如“焦虑”和“封锁”)的搜索频率。使用牛津COVID-19政府应对追踪器(OxCGRT)将这些搜索趋势与政府行动进行关联分析。研究期涵盖2020年3月1日至2020年10月10日,并使用R编程中的定制软件进行了广泛的数据收集和分析。
政府实施的限制措施的严格程度与与心理困扰相关的在线搜索量之间存在显著相关性。“封锁”搜索量的增加与政府限制的加强同时出现,并且与“焦虑”搜索量的增加相关,这表明政策措施对公众心理困扰有重大影响。
该研究得出结论,通过OxCGRT衡量的政府对COVID-19大流行的应对措施对公众心理困扰有可衡量的影响,在线搜索行为证明了这一点。这强调了在政策制定中考虑心理影响的重要性,并建议进一步研究以全面探索这种动态关系。未来的研究应专注于完善特定类型政策措施与心理困扰不同表现之间的相关性,以便更好地为公共卫生策略和干预措施提供信息。