Protzko John
Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, USA.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct 28:00131644241282982. doi: 10.1177/00131644241282982.
Measurement involves numerous theoretical and empirical steps-ensuring our measures are operating the same in different groups is one step. Measurement invariance occurs when the factor loadings and item intercepts or thresholds of a scale operate similarly for people at the same level of the latent variable in different groups. This is commonly assumed to mean the scale is measuring the same thing in those groups. Here we test the assumption of extending measurement invariance to mean common measurement by randomly assigning American adults ( = 1500) to fill out scales assessing a coherent factor (search for meaning in life) or a nonsense factor measuring nothing. We find a nonsense scale with items measuring nothing shows strong measurement invariance with the original scale, is reliable, and covaries with other constructs. We show measurement invariance can occur without measurement. Thus, we cannot infer that measurement invariance means one is measuring the same thing, it may be a necessary but not a sufficient condition.
测量涉及众多理论和实证步骤——确保我们的测量在不同群体中以相同方式运作是其中一步。当一个量表的因子载荷以及项目截距或阈值在不同群体中对于处于相同潜在变量水平的人以相似方式运作时,就会出现测量不变性。通常认为这意味着该量表在那些群体中测量的是同一事物。在此,我们通过随机分配美国成年人((n = 1500))来填写评估一个连贯因子(探寻生活意义)或一个毫无意义、不测量任何东西的因子的量表,来检验将测量不变性扩展为意味着共同测量这一假设。我们发现一个由不测量任何东西的项目组成的无意义量表与原始量表呈现出很强的测量不变性,具有可靠性,并且与其他构念相关。我们表明,测量不变性可以在没有测量的情况下出现。因此,我们不能推断测量不变性意味着一个人测量的是同一事物,它可能是一个必要但不充分的条件。