Lasker Jordan
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Sep;48(6):257-275. doi: 10.1177/01466216241261708. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
Psychometricians have argued that measurement invariance (MI) testing is needed to know if the same psychological constructs are measured in different groups. Data from five experiments allowed that position to be tested. In the first, participants answered questionnaires on belief in free will and either the meaning of life or the meaning of a nonsense concept called "gavagai." Since the meaning of life and the meaning of gavagai conceptually differ, MI should have been violated when groups were treated like their measurements were identical. MI was severely violated, indicating the questionnaires were interpreted differently. In the second and third experiments, participants were randomized to watch treatment videos explaining figural matrices rules or task-irrelevant control videos. Participants then took intelligence and figural matrices tests. The intervention worked and the experimental group had an additional influence on figural matrix performance in the form of knowing matrix rules, so their performance on the matrices tests violated MI and was anomalously high for their intelligence levels. In both experiments, MI was severely violated. In the fourth and fifth experiments, individuals were exposed to growth mindset interventions that a twin study revealed changed the amount of genetic variance in the target mindset measure without affecting other variables. When comparing treatment and control groups, MI was attainable before but not after treatment. Moreover, the control group showed longitudinal invariance, but the same was untrue for the treatment group. MI testing is likely able to show if the same things are measured in different groups.
心理测量学家认为,需要进行测量不变性(MI)测试,以了解在不同群体中测量的是否是相同的心理结构。来自五个实验的数据对这一观点进行了检验。在第一个实验中,参与者回答了关于自由意志信念以及生命意义或一个名为“gavagai”的无意义概念的意义的问卷。由于生命的意义和gavagai的意义在概念上不同,当将不同群体视为其测量结果相同时,MI应该会被违反。MI被严重违反,这表明问卷的解释方式不同。在第二个和第三个实验中,参与者被随机分配观看解释图形矩阵规则的治疗视频或与任务无关的控制视频。然后,参与者进行了智力和图形矩阵测试。干预措施起了作用,实验组通过了解矩阵规则对图形矩阵表现产生了额外影响,因此他们在矩阵测试中的表现违反了MI,并且对于他们的智力水平来说异常高。在这两个实验中,MI都被严重违反。在第四个和第五个实验中,个体接受了成长型思维干预,一项双胞胎研究表明,这种干预改变了目标思维测量中的遗传方差量,而不影响其他变量。在比较治疗组和对照组时,治疗前MI是可以实现的,但治疗后则不然。此外,对照组显示出纵向不变性,但治疗组并非如此。MI测试可能能够表明在不同群体中测量的是否是相同的事物。