• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语音预测误差的会聚神经特征是口语识别的生物学标记。

Convergent neural signatures of speech prediction error are a biological marker for spoken word recognition.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 18;15(1):9984. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53782-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-53782-5
PMID:39557848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574182/
Abstract

We use MEG and fMRI to determine how predictions are combined with speech input in superior temporal cortex. We compare neural responses to words in which first syllables strongly or weakly predict second syllables (e.g., "bingo", "snigger" versus "tango", "meagre"). We further compare neural responses to the same second syllables when predictions mismatch with input during pseudoword perception (e.g., "snigo" and "meago"). Neural representations of second syllables are suppressed by strong predictions when predictions match sensory input but show the opposite effect when predictions mismatch. Computational simulations show that this interaction is consistent with prediction error but not alternative (sharpened signal) computations. Neural signatures of prediction error are observed 200 ms after second syllable onset and in early auditory regions (bilateral Heschl's gyrus and STG). These findings demonstrate prediction error computations during the identification of familiar spoken words and perception of unfamiliar pseudowords.

摘要

我们使用 MEG 和 fMRI 来确定预测信息是如何与语音输入结合在一起来到颞上皮质的。我们比较了在强预测和弱预测条件下,大脑对首音节强烈或微弱预测次音节的单词(例如“bingo”“snigger”与“tango”“meagre”)的神经反应。我们还比较了在感知假词时,预测与输入不匹配时对相同次音节的神经反应(例如“snigo”和“meago”)。当预测与感觉输入匹配时,强预测会抑制次音节的神经表示,但当预测与输入不匹配时,会产生相反的效果。计算模拟表明,这种相互作用与预测误差一致,而与其他(锐化信号)计算不一致。在次音节出现后 200 毫秒和早期听觉区域(双侧海氏回和颞上回)观察到了预测误差的神经特征。这些发现表明,在识别熟悉的口语单词和感知不熟悉的假词时,会进行预测误差计算。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/8261a9873557/41467_2024_53782_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/aced6e489333/41467_2024_53782_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/219f19b734ef/41467_2024_53782_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/7c6f9650fabc/41467_2024_53782_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/a8ce95a8dc0e/41467_2024_53782_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/8261a9873557/41467_2024_53782_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/aced6e489333/41467_2024_53782_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/219f19b734ef/41467_2024_53782_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/7c6f9650fabc/41467_2024_53782_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/a8ce95a8dc0e/41467_2024_53782_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/11574182/8261a9873557/41467_2024_53782_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Convergent neural signatures of speech prediction error are a biological marker for spoken word recognition.语音预测误差的会聚神经特征是口语识别的生物学标记。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 18;15(1):9984. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53782-5.
2
Predictive Neural Computations Support Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence from MEG and Competitor Priming.预测性神经计算支持口语识别:来自 MEG 和竞争启动的证据。
J Neurosci. 2021 Aug 11;41(32):6919-6932. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1685-20.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Balancing Prediction and Sensory Input in Speech Comprehension: The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Recognition in Context.在言语理解中平衡预测和感觉输入:语境中单词识别的时空动态。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 16;39(3):519-527. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3573-17.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex.听觉皮层中口语单词的时间预测码。
Curr Biol. 2012 Apr 10;22(7):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Decoding Articulatory Features from fMRI Responses in Dorsal Speech Regions.从背侧言语区域的功能磁共振成像反应中解码发音特征
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 11;35(45):15015-25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0977-15.2015.
6
Stimulus-dependent activations and attention-related modulations in the auditory cortex: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.听觉皮层中与刺激相关的激活和与注意相关的调制:功能磁共振成像研究的荟萃分析。
Hear Res. 2014 Jan;307:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
7
Decoding the Cortical Dynamics of Sound-Meaning Mapping.解码声音-意义映射的皮层动力学
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1312-1319. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2858-16.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
8
Sublexical properties of spoken words modulate activity in Broca's area but not superior temporal cortex: implications for models of speech recognition.语音词的亚词汇性质调节布罗卡区的活动,但不调节颞上皮质的活动:对语音识别模型的启示。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2665-74. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21620. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
9
Objective phonological and subjective perceptual characteristics of syllables modulate spatiotemporal patterns of superior temporal gyrus activity.音节的客观语音和主观感知特征调节颞上回活动的时空模式。
Neuroimage. 2008 May 1;40(4):1888-901. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.048. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
10
A special role for the right posterior superior temporal sulcus during speech production.右后上颞回在言语产生过程中的特殊作用。
Neuroimage. 2019 Dec;203:116184. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116184. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Can prediction error explain predictability effects on the N1 during picture-word verification?预测误差能否解释图片-单词验证过程中对N1的可预测性效应?
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Apr 8;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00131. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A predictive coding model of the N400.N400的预测编码模型。
Cognition. 2024 May;246:105755. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105755. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Large-scale single-neuron speech sound encoding across the depth of human cortex.人类大脑皮层深度范围内的大规模单神经元语音编码
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(7999):593-602. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06839-2. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
A tradeoff between acoustic and linguistic feature encoding in spoken language comprehension.口语理解中声学和语言特征编码之间的权衡。
Elife. 2023 Jul 7;12:e82386. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82386.
4
Joint, distributed and hierarchically organized encoding of linguistic features in the human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层中语言特征的联合、分布式和分层组织编码。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 May;7(5):740-753. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01520-0. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech.人类大脑在听语音时存在预测编码层级的证据。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Mar;7(3):430-441. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01516-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Neural dynamics of phoneme sequences reveal position-invariant code for content and order.音素序列的神经动力学揭示了内容和顺序的位置不变代码。
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 3;13(1):6606. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34326-1.
7
Reconstructing the predictive architecture of the mind and brain.重构心灵和大脑的预测架构。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Dec;26(12):1018-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Cortical depth profiles of auditory and visual 7 T functional MRI responses in human superior temporal areas.人类上颞区听觉和视觉 7T 功能磁共振成像反应的皮质深度分布。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Feb 1;44(2):362-372. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26046. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
9
A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension.自然语言理解过程中的语言预测层次。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 9;119(32):e2201968119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201968119. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
10
Shared computational principles for language processing in humans and deep language models.人类和深度语言模型语言处理的共享计算原则。
Nat Neurosci. 2022 Mar;25(3):369-380. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01026-4. Epub 2022 Mar 7.