• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症关键数据:利用电子健康记录数据进行研究的指南——来自危重病医学会数据共享与协调专家组

Critical Data for Critical Care: A Primer on Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Research From Society of Critical Care Medicine's Panel on Data Sharing and Harmonization.

机构信息

Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2024 Nov 15;6(11):e1179. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001179. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001179
PMID:39559555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11573330/
Abstract

A growing body of critical care research draws on real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs). The bedside clinician has myriad data sources to aid in clinical decision-making, but the lack of data sharing and harmonization standards leaves much of this data out of reach for multi-institution critical care research. The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Discovery Data Science Campaign convened a panel of critical care and data science experts to explore and document unique advantages and opportunities for leveraging EHR data in critical care research. This article reviews and illustrates six organizing topics (data domains and common data elements; data harmonization; data quality; data interoperability and digital infrastructure; data access, sharing, and governance; and ethics and equity) as a data science primer for critical care researchers, laying a foundation for future publications from the SCCM Discovery Data Harmonization and Sharing Guiding Principles Panel.

摘要

越来越多的重症监护研究利用电子健康记录 (EHR) 中的真实世界数据。床边临床医生有无数的数据源来辅助临床决策,但由于缺乏数据共享和协调标准,使得许多此类数据无法用于多机构重症监护研究。重症监护医学会 (SCCM) 发现数据科学运动召集了一组重症监护和数据科学专家,探讨和记录利用电子健康记录数据在重症监护研究中的独特优势和机会。本文回顾并说明了六个组织主题(数据领域和常用数据元素;数据协调;数据质量;数据互操作性和数字基础设施;数据访问、共享和治理;以及伦理和公平),作为重症监护研究人员的数据科学入门指南,为 SCCM 发现数据协调和共享指导原则小组的未来出版物奠定基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db24/11573330/995cbaf7f549/cc9-6-e1179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db24/11573330/60c398f20456/cc9-6-e1179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db24/11573330/bae26278d1e2/cc9-6-e1179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db24/11573330/995cbaf7f549/cc9-6-e1179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db24/11573330/60c398f20456/cc9-6-e1179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db24/11573330/bae26278d1e2/cc9-6-e1179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db24/11573330/995cbaf7f549/cc9-6-e1179-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Critical Data for Critical Care: A Primer on Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Research From Society of Critical Care Medicine's Panel on Data Sharing and Harmonization.危重症关键数据:利用电子健康记录数据进行研究的指南——来自危重病医学会数据共享与协调专家组
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Nov 15;6(11):e1179. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001179. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Guiding Principles for Data Sharing and Harmonization: Results of a Systematic Review and Modified Delphi From the Society of Critical Care Medicine Data Science Campaign.数据共享与协调的指导原则:重症医学学会数据科学运动的系统评价和改良德尔菲法结果
Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 1;53(3):e619-e631. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006578. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Semantic Interoperability of Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review of Alternative Approaches for Enhancing Patient Information Availability.电子健康记录的语义互操作性:增强患者信息可用性的替代方法系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Apr 25;12:e53535. doi: 10.2196/53535.
4
The Impact of Electronic Health Record Interoperability on Safety and Quality of Care in High-Income Countries: Systematic Review.电子健康记录互操作性对高收入国家的医疗安全和质量的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 15;24(9):e38144. doi: 10.2196/38144.
5
Electronic health records and data exchange in the WHO European region: A subregional analysis of achievements, challenges, and prospects.世界卫生组织欧洲区域的电子健康记录与数据交换:次区域成就、挑战及前景分析
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Feb;194:105687. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105687. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
6
Leveraging electronic health records for clinical research.利用电子健康记录进行临床研究。
Am Heart J. 2018 Aug;202:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
ACTION-EHR: Patient-Centric Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Data Management for Cancer Care.ACTION-EHR:基于区块链的以患者为中心的电子健康记录数据管理系统在癌症护理中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 21;22(8):e13598. doi: 10.2196/13598.
8
Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.影响丹麦和瑞士协调健康数据收集、共享和链接的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226015. eCollection 2019.
9
Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: a focus group study.患者及护理人员对英国国民医疗服务体系中电子健康记录互操作性的看法及其对护理质量的影响:一项焦点小组研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02789-5.
10
Enhancing Standardized and Structured Recording by Elderly Care Physicians for Reusing Electronic Health Record Data: Interview Study.提高老年护理医生的标准化和结构化记录以复用电子健康记录数据:访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Dec 13;12:e63710. doi: 10.2196/63710.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging the power of routinely collected ICU data.利用常规收集的重症监护病房数据的力量。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):163-166. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07745-5. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic Interoperability of Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review of Alternative Approaches for Enhancing Patient Information Availability.电子健康记录的语义互操作性:增强患者信息可用性的替代方法系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Apr 25;12:e53535. doi: 10.2196/53535.
2
Minimizing bias when using artificial intelligence in critical care medicine.在重症医学中使用人工智能时尽量减少偏差。
J Crit Care. 2024 Aug;82:154796. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154796. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3
Health data sharing attitudes towards primary and secondary use of data: a systematic review.
对健康数据初次使用和二次使用的共享态度:一项系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 18;71:102551. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102551. eCollection 2024 May.
4
The N3C governance ecosystem: A model socio-technical partnership for the future of collaborative analytics at scale.N3C治理生态系统:大规模协作分析未来的一种模范社会技术伙伴关系。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 14;7(1):e252. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.681. eCollection 2023.
5
National ICU Registries as Enablers of Clinical Research and Quality Improvement.国家重症监护病房登记处助力临床研究与质量改进。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;52(1):125-135. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006050. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
The Data and Research Center: Creating a Secure, Scalable, and Sustainable Ecosystem for Biomedical Research.数据与研究中心:为生物医学研究创建安全、可扩展和可持续的生态系统。
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2023 Aug 10;6:443-464. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122120-104825.
7
Deep transfer learning for clinical decision-making based on high-throughput data: comprehensive survey with benchmark results.基于高通量数据的临床决策深度学习:全面调查及基准结果
Brief Bioinform. 2023 Jul 20;24(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad254.
8
Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.电子健康记录数据质量评估及工具:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1730-1740. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad120.
9
A guide to sharing open healthcare data under the General Data Protection Regulation.《通用数据保护条例》下开放医疗保健数据共享指南。
Sci Data. 2023 Jun 24;10(1):404. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02256-2.
10
Clinical encounter heterogeneity and methods for resolving in networked EHR data: a study from N3C and RECOVER programs.临床遇到的异质性和解决网络电子健康记录数据中的异质性的方法:来自 N3C 和 RECOVER 项目的研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 May 19;30(6):1125-1136. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad057.