Suppr超能文献

重症监护患者中超声与热稀释法心输出量测量的比较。

Comparison between ultrasonic and thermodilution cardiac output measurements in intensive care patients.

作者信息

Vandenbogaerde J F, Scheldewaert R G, Rijckaert D L, Clement D L, Colardyn F A

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1986 Apr;14(4):294-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198604000-00010.

Abstract

The reliability of ultrasonic cardiac output measurement was assessed using a commercial device that combines A-mode aortic root diameter determination and continuous wave (CW) Doppler flow velocity measurement in the ascending aorta. We compared this method with thermodilution (TD) cardiac output in 41 intensive care patients. Aortic root diameter measurement with A-mode was not possible in four (10%) patients. Using strictly defined criteria based upon our initial experience, we could not obtain acceptable CW Doppler flow signals in nine (22%) patients. Thus, ultrasonic cardiac output measurement was possible in 28 (68%) patients in whom there was an excellent correlation with cardiac output (r = 0.97; p less than .001). This study demonstrates that the transcutaneous CW Doppler method for measuring cardiac output is accurate and reliable in a limited percentage of ICU patients. Combining the CW Doppler with B-mode echocardiogram increases the applicability when an A-mode measurement is not possible.

摘要

使用一种结合了A模式主动脉根部直径测定和升主动脉连续波(CW)多普勒流速测量的商用设备,评估超声心输出量测量的可靠性。我们在41名重症监护患者中,将该方法与热稀释法(TD)心输出量进行了比较。4名(10%)患者无法用A模式测量主动脉根部直径。根据我们的初步经验,采用严格定义的标准,9名(22%)患者无法获得可接受的CW多普勒血流信号。因此,28名(68%)患者能够进行超声心输出量测量,这些患者的心输出量与之具有极佳的相关性(r = 0.97;p < 0.001)。本研究表明,经皮CW多普勒测量心输出量的方法在有限比例的ICU患者中准确可靠。当无法进行A模式测量时,将CW多普勒与B模式超声心动图相结合可提高适用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验