Suppr超能文献

中央视野中差别阈限的解释。

The interpretation of the differential threshold in the central visual field.

作者信息

Wild J M, Wood J M, Flanagan J G, Good P A, Crews S J

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 1986 Feb 28;62(2):191-202. doi: 10.1007/BF00229130.

Abstract

Computer assisted perimetry has revolutionised the investigation of the visual field. Experience of central field assessment with the Octopus Automated Perimeter shows that sensitivity recorded with target size 3 across all age groups can frequently be greater than the published normative values. Use of the latter values can therefore provide a serious underestimation of field loss. Inter-individual variation in sensitivity is found within and between age groups. The limitations associated with the use of the measurement error to define abnormality and the additional problems of hypernormal thresholds and resolution of the blind spot are discussed. It is suggested that methods should be developed to evaluate sensitivity on an intra-individual basis.

摘要

计算机辅助视野检查法彻底改变了视野研究。使用章鱼自动视野计进行中心视野评估的经验表明,在所有年龄组中,目标大小为3时记录的敏感度常常高于已公布的正常值。因此,使用后者的值可能会严重低估视野缺损。在年龄组内和年龄组之间都发现了敏感度的个体差异。文中讨论了使用测量误差来定义异常的局限性以及超常阈值和盲点分辨率的其他问题。建议应开发基于个体内部来评估敏感度的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验