Wilensky J T, Joondeph B C
Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Mar;97(3):328-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90631-7.
Using the Octopus automated perimeter, we conducted visual measurements on four separate occasions during a four-week period in six subjects with normal eyes. In 11 of 12 eyes, we found at least one point at which the threshold for light detection determined for that point showed a variance of more than 4 dB between tests. Thus, automated visual fields must be interpreted cautiously because an apparent pathologic change may only represent normal variation.
我们使用Octopus自动视野计,在四周内对六名视力正常的受试者进行了四次独立的视觉测量。在12只眼睛中的11只眼中,我们发现至少有一个点,该点的光检测阈值在两次测试之间的差异超过4 dB。因此,对自动视野检查结果的解读必须谨慎,因为明显的病理变化可能仅仅代表正常变异。