• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者获取电子健康记录对医疗保健参与的影响:系统评价。

The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records on Health Care Engagement: Systematic Review.

机构信息

Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science System, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Nuclear Medicine Department, Faisal Sultan Bin Eissa, Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 20;26:e56473. doi: 10.2196/56473.

DOI:10.2196/56473
PMID:39566058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618012/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health information technologies, including electronic health records (EHRs), have revolutionized health care delivery. These technologies promise to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through improved patient health information management. Despite the transformative potential of EHRs, the extent to which patient access contributes to increased engagement with health care services within different clinical setting remains a distinct and underexplored facet.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to investigate the impact of patient access to EHRs on health care engagement. Specifically, we seek to determine whether providing patients with access to their EHRs contributes to improved engagement with health care services.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review search was conducted across various international databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 2010, to November 15, 2023. The search on these databases was conducted using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms related to patient access to electronic health records, patient engagement, and health care services. Studies were included if they assessed the impact of patient access to EHRs on health care engagement and provided evidence (quantitative or qualitative) for that. The guidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 statement were followed for study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The included studies were assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the results were reported using a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

The initial search from the databases yielded 1737 studies, to which, after scanning their reference lists, we added 10 studies. Of these 1747 studies, 18 (1.03%) met the inclusion criteria for the final review. The synthesized evidence from these studies revealed a positive relationship between patient access to EHRs and health care engagement, addressing 6 categories of health care engagement dimensions and outcomes, including treatment adherence and self-management, patient involvement and empowerment, health care communication and relationship, patient satisfaction and health outcomes, use of health care resources, and usability concerns and barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggested a positive association between patient access to EHRs and health care engagement. The implications of these findings for health care providers, policy makers, and patients should be considered, highlighting the potential benefits and challenges associated with implementing and promoting patient access to EHRs. Further research directions have been proposed to deepen our understanding of this dynamic relationship.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b3/11618012/5784b14c2643/jmir_v26i1e56473_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b3/11618012/5784b14c2643/jmir_v26i1e56473_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b3/11618012/5784b14c2643/jmir_v26i1e56473_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

健康信息技术,包括电子健康记录 (EHR),已经彻底改变了医疗保健的提供方式。这些技术有望通过改善患者健康信息管理来提高医疗服务的效率和质量。尽管 EHR 具有变革性的潜力,但患者访问在不同临床环境中增加医疗服务参与度的程度仍然是一个独特且尚未充分探索的方面。

目的

本系统评价旨在研究患者访问 EHR 对医疗服务参与度的影响。具体而言,我们旨在确定为患者提供访问 EHR 是否有助于提高对医疗服务的参与度。

方法

对包括 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 在内的多个国际数据库进行了全面的系统检索,以确定自 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 15 日期间发表的相关研究。这些数据库上的搜索使用了与患者访问电子健康记录、患者参与度和医疗服务相关的关键词和医学主题词的组合。如果研究评估了患者访问 EHR 对医疗服务参与度的影响,并提供了相关证据(定量或定性),则将其纳入研究。研究选择、数据提取和质量评估均遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)2020 声明的指南。使用混合方法评估工具对纳入的研究进行质量评估,并使用叙述性综合报告结果。

结果

数据库中的初步搜索产生了 1737 项研究,在扫描其参考文献后,我们又添加了 10 项研究。在这 1747 项研究中,有 18 项(1.03%)符合最终综述的纳入标准。对这些研究的综合证据表明,患者访问 EHR 与医疗服务参与度之间存在正相关关系,涉及医疗服务参与度的 6 个维度和结果,包括治疗依从性和自我管理、患者参与和赋权、医疗保健沟通和关系、患者满意度和健康结果、医疗保健资源的使用以及可用性问题和障碍。

结论

研究结果表明患者访问 EHR 与医疗服务参与度之间存在正相关关系。这些发现对医疗保健提供者、政策制定者和患者具有重要意义,突出了实施和推广患者访问 EHR 所带来的潜在益处和挑战。已经提出了进一步的研究方向,以深化我们对这一动态关系的理解。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records on Health Care Engagement: Systematic Review.患者获取电子健康记录对医疗保健参与的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 20;26:e56473. doi: 10.2196/56473.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
10
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Electronic Health Services on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.电子健康服务对初级保健中患者满意度的影响:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2025 May 12;17(5):e83949. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83949. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Prevalence and types of errors in the electronic health record: protocol for a mixed systematic review.电子健康记录中的错误发生率及类型:一项混合系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 9;15(6):e098241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098241.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of electronic health records on doctor-patient relationship in Arabian gulf countries: a systematic review.电子健康记录对阿拉伯海湾国家医患关系的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Oct 6;5:1252227. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1252227. eCollection 2023.
2
The role of electronic medical records in improving health care quality: A quasi-experimental study.电子病历在改善医疗质量中的作用:一项准实验研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29627. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029627.
3
The Power of Patient Engagement With Electronic Health Records as Research Participants.
患者作为研究参与者参与电子健康记录的力量。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jul 8;10(7):e39145. doi: 10.2196/39145.
4
Experiences and expectation with the use of health data: a qualitative interview study in primary care.使用健康数据的经验和期望:初级保健中的定性访谈研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 23;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01764-1.
5
The Impact of Patient Access to Their Electronic Health Record on Medication Management Safety: A Narrative Review.患者获取其电子健康记录对药物管理安全性的影响:一项叙述性综述
Saudi Pharm J. 2022 Mar;30(3):185-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Feasibility of Electronic Health Record Integration of a SMART Application to Facilitate Patient-Provider Communication for Medication Management.SMART 应用程序电子健康记录集成以促进药物管理医患沟通的可行性。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2022 Aug 1;40(8):538-546. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000891.
7
Patient empowerment through a user-centered design of an electronic personal health record: a qualitative study of user requirements in chronic kidney disease.通过以用户为中心的电子个人健康记录设计实现患者赋权:慢性肾脏病患者需求的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 24;21(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01689-2.
8
Implementation of Patient Engagement Tools in Electronic Health Records to Enhance Patient-Centered Communication: Protocol for Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Results.在电子健康记录中实施患者参与工具以加强以患者为中心的沟通:可行性评估方案及初步结果
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 26;10(8):e30431. doi: 10.2196/30431.
9
Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.患者反对使用可访问的电子健康记录的理由:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 28;23(5):e24090. doi: 10.2196/24090.
10
Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review.患者获取电子健康记录的影响:系统评价。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Jun 2;46(2):192-204. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810. Epub 2021 Apr 10.