• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录中的错误发生率及类型:一项混合系统评价方案

Prevalence and types of errors in the electronic health record: protocol for a mixed systematic review.

作者信息

Kharko Anna, Hägglund Maria, Angelova Dafina, Scott Duncan Therese, Hagström Josefin, Hansford Kirralise, Hunt Joanne, Trolle Lagerros Ylva, Locher Cosima, McMillan Brian, Nivins Asha-Judy, Rosch Sophie Anna, Schwarz Julian, Simola Saija, Blease Charlotte

机构信息

Department of Women and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 9;15(6):e098241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098241.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098241
PMID:40490366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12161391/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In countries with access to the electronic health record (EHR), both patients and healthcare professionals have reported finding errors in the EHR, so-called EHRrors. These can range from simple typos to more serious cases of missing or incorrect health information. Despite their potential detrimental effect, the evidence on EHRrors has not been systematically analysed. It is unknown how common EHRrors are or how they impact patients and healthcare professionals.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A mixed systematic review will be carried out to address the research gap. We will search PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL for studies published since 2000, which report original research data on patient-identified and healthcare professional-identified EHRrors. We will analyse (1) the prevalence of EHRrors, (2) the types of EHRrors and (3) their impact on care. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be synthesised following the Joanna Briggs Institute Framework for Mixed Systematic Reviews. Identified studies will be critically appraised for meta-biases and risk of bias in individual studies. The confidence in the emerging evidence will be further assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Findings will be contextualised and interpreted involving an international team of patient representatives and practising healthcare professionals.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will not involve collection or analysis of individual patient data; thus, ethical approval is not required. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed publication and further disseminated through scientific events and educational materials.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024622849.

摘要

引言

在可获取电子健康记录(EHR)的国家,患者和医疗保健专业人员都报告称在EHR中发现了错误,即所谓的电子健康记录错误(EHRrors)。这些错误范围从简单的拼写错误到更严重的健康信息缺失或错误情况。尽管它们可能产生有害影响,但关于电子健康记录错误的证据尚未得到系统分析。目前尚不清楚电子健康记录错误有多常见,以及它们如何影响患者和医疗保健专业人员。

方法与分析

将进行一项混合系统评价以填补这一研究空白。我们将在PubMed、科学网和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)中检索自2000年以来发表的研究,这些研究报告了关于患者识别和医疗保健专业人员识别的电子健康记录错误的原始研究数据。我们将分析(1)电子健康记录错误的发生率,(2)电子健康记录错误的类型,以及(3)它们对医疗护理的影响。将按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所混合系统评价框架对定量和定性研究结果进行综合分析。对纳入的研究将针对元偏差和个别研究中的偏倚风险进行严格评估。将通过推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法进一步评估新出现证据的可信度。研究结果将结合国际患者代表和执业医疗保健专业人员团队进行背景化和解读。

伦理与传播

本研究不涉及收集或分析个体患者数据;因此,无需伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评审的出版物上,并通过科学活动和教育材料进一步传播。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024622849。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d6/12161391/1fc67c7c7888/bmjopen-15-6-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d6/12161391/329c3bf6fd55/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d6/12161391/1fc67c7c7888/bmjopen-15-6-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d6/12161391/329c3bf6fd55/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d6/12161391/1fc67c7c7888/bmjopen-15-6-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and types of errors in the electronic health record: protocol for a mixed systematic review.电子健康记录中的错误发生率及类型:一项混合系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 9;15(6):e098241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098241.
2
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records on Health Care Engagement: Systematic Review.患者获取电子健康记录对医疗保健参与的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 20;26:e56473. doi: 10.2196/56473.
2
Experiences from patients in mental healthcare accessing their electronic health records: results from a cross-national survey in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.精神卫生保健患者获取电子健康记录的体验:来自爱沙尼亚、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的跨国调查结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05916-8.
3
Experiences and opinions of general practitioners with patient online record access: an online survey in England.
全科医生对患者在线病历访问的体验和看法:英格兰的一项在线调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):e078158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078158.
4
: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.一个用于生成符合PRISMA 2020标准流程图的R包和Shiny应用程序,具有交互性以实现优化的数字透明度和开放综合。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 27;18(2):e1230. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
A qualitative study of the dark and bright sides of physicians' electronic health record work outside work hours.一项关于医生在工作时间之外使用电子健康记录的利弊的定性研究。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2023;48(2):140-149. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000361.
6
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
7
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.混合方法系统评价实施的方法学指导。
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Jun 1;19(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000282.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明的扩展。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
10
Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: a scoping review.使用电子健康记录衡量医生和护士的临床文档负担:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):998-1008. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa325.