Leite Jéssica Costa, Dornelas de Andrade Armele, Araújo Bruna T S, Nunes da Hora Endy Bianca, Figueiredo Thainá de Gomes, da Silva Josicléia Leôncio, Remígio de Aguiar Maria Inês, Martins Sílvia Marinho, Campos Shirley Lima, Brandão Daniella Cunha
Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):101144. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101144. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for functional capacity assessment, although it is costly and not easily accessible. The Glittre-ADL test may be a low-cost alternative for patients with heart failure.
To establish a cutoff point for functional capacity of patients with heart failure using the Glittre-ADL test. We also assessed agreement, reliability, and minimal detectable change.
This cross-sectional study was conducted with 78 patients (aged 21 to 65 years) with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (functional classes II and III of the New York Heart Association). Test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine whether ADL-time, could distinguish between patients with peak oxygen consumption (VO) < 16 versus those ≥ 16 ml/kg/min.
A cutoff point of 255 s (76 % sensitivity [95 % CI 58, 89] and 72 % specificity [95 % CI 56, 85]) was established based on the total time spent on Glittre-ADL test; the area under the curve was 0.773 (95 % CI 0.663, 0.861; p < 0.0001). Regarding agreement, a significant correlation was found between test and retest (r = 0.83, r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient, absolute reliability, and minimal detectable change were 0.84 (95 % CI 0.45, 0.94; p < 0.001), 3.2 %, and 8.8 % (23.1 s), respectively.
Glittre-ADL test showed good reproducibility in repeated tests. Thus, the cutoff point established by our study can be used in clinical practice instead of CPET to identify patients with severe heart failure.
心肺运动试验(CPET)是功能能力评估的金标准,尽管其成本高昂且不易获得。Glittre-ADL试验可能是心力衰竭患者的低成本替代方案。
使用Glittre-ADL试验确定心力衰竭患者功能能力的临界点。我们还评估了一致性、可靠性和最小可检测变化。
本横断面研究纳入了78例年龄在21至65岁之间、射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者(纽约心脏协会心功能II级和III级)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)测量重测可靠性,同时使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来确定ADL时间是否能够区分峰值耗氧量(VO)<16与≥16 ml/kg/min的患者。
基于Glittre-ADL试验的总用时确定的临界点为255秒(敏感性76% [95% CI 58, 89],特异性72% [95% CI 56, 85]);曲线下面积为0.773(95% CI 0.663, 0.861;p < 0.0001)。关于一致性,发现测试与重测之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.83,r = 0.69,p < 0.001)。组内相关系数、绝对可靠性和最小可检测变化分别为0.84(95% CI 0.45, 0.94;p < 0.001)、3.2%和8.8%(23.1秒)。
Glittre-ADL试验在重复测试中显示出良好的可重复性。因此,我们研究确定的临界点可用于临床实践,以替代CPET来识别重度心力衰竭患者。