Bartman Nathan E, Vargas Nicole T, Cavuoto Lora A, Hostler David, Pryor Riana R
Center for Research and Education in Special Environments, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, AU, Australia.
Temperature (Austin). 2024 Aug 26;11(4):333-349. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185. eCollection 2024.
Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a commonly used measure to predict heat strain in workers. Different combinations of environmental conditions can create equivalent WBGT, yet it remains unknown whether biophysical, physiological, and perceptual responses vary when working in different but equivalent hot conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare body heat storage and physiological and perceptual strain during walking in hot-dry and warm-wet conditions of the same WBGT. Twelve subjects (age: 22 ± 2 y) walked for 90 min at 60% maximum heart rate in a 27.8°C WBGT environment of hot-dry (HD: 40°C, 19% relative humidity) or warm-wet (WW: 30°C, 77% relative humidity) conditions. Partitional calorimetry was used to estimate heat storage. Core temperature at 90 min (HD: 38.5 ± 0.5°C; WW: 38.4 ± 0.3°C, = 0.244) and cumulative heat storage (HD: 115 ± 531 Kj; WW: 333 ± 269 Kj, = 0.242) were not different. At 90 min, heart rate was not different (HD: 160 ± 19 bpm; WW: 154 ± 15 bpm, = 0.149) but skin temperature (HD: 36.6 ± 0.9°C; WW: 34.7 ± 0.6°C, < 0.001), thirst (HD: 6.8 a.u.; WW: 5.3 a.u. = 0.043), and sweat rate (HD: 15.1 ± 4.4 g·min; WW: 10.0 ± 4.1 g·min, < 0.001) were greater in HD compared to WW. Hot environments of equivalent 27.8°C WBGT created equivalent core temperature despite differences in physiological strain during exercise, including earlier onset of cardiovascular strain, greater sweat rate, and higher skin temperature compared to a WW environment. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04624919.
湿球黑球温度(WBGT)是一种常用的预测工人热应激的指标。不同的环境条件组合可产生相同的WBGT,但在不同但等效的炎热条件下工作时,生物物理、生理和感知反应是否存在差异仍不清楚。本研究的目的是比较在相同WBGT的干热和湿热条件下行走时的身体热储存、生理和感知应激。12名受试者(年龄:22±2岁)在27.8°C的WBGT环境中,以最大心率的60%在干热(HD:40°C,相对湿度19%)或湿热(WW:30°C,相对湿度77%)条件下行走90分钟。采用分区量热法估算热储存。90分钟时的核心温度(HD:38.5±0.5°C;WW:38.4±0.3°C,P=0.244)和累积热储存(HD:115±531kJ;WW:333±269kJ,P=0.242)无差异。90分钟时,心率无差异(HD:160±19次/分钟;WW:154±15次/分钟,P=0.149),但皮肤温度(HD:36.6±0.9°C;WW:34.7±0.6°C,P<0.001)、口渴感(HD:6.8任意单位;WW:5.3任意单位,P=0.043)和出汗率(HD:15.1±4.4克/分钟;WW:10.0±4.1克/分钟,P<0.001)在HD组比WW组更高。尽管运动期间生理应激存在差异,包括心血管应激更早出现、出汗率更高和皮肤温度更高,但等效27.8°C WBGT的炎热环境仍产生了相同的核心温度。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT04624919。