• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国养老院护理使用情况的地区差异。

Regional variation in the utilization of nursing home care in Germany.

作者信息

Herr Annika, Lückemann Maximilian, Saric-Babin Amela

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics (IHE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, CHERH Und CINCH, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167, Hannover, Germany.

CINCH, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jul;26(5):757-776. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01732-9. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-024-01732-9
PMID:39585525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12204949/
Abstract

Approximately 32 percent of individuals aged over 64 years old, with care needs, are residing in nursing homes in Germany. However, this percentage exhibits significant regional disparities, ranging from under 15 percent in certain counties to over 50 percent in others. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the underlying factors explaining this regional variation in nursing home utilization. We employed comprehensive administrative data encompassing the entire elderly care-dependent population and all nursing homes. Our analytical approach involves the use of linear regression models at the county level, accounting for an extensive array of control variables and fixed effects. Additionally, we analyzed regional dependencies by applying spatial lag models. In summary, our model successfully predicts up to 73 percent of the observed regional variation in nursing home utilization. Key factors include care needs, the presence of informal care support and the supply of professional care. Spatial dependencies can be detected but exhibit a minor influence on these variations controlling for care needs. Noteworthy, enabling factors, such as a region's wealth or rurality, have a very limited impact in a country with a generous social insurance system that covers care for those with limited financial resources.

摘要

在德国,约32%有护理需求的64岁以上老人居住在养老院。然而,这一比例存在显著的地区差异,某些县低于15%,而其他县则超过50%。本研究的目的是阐明导致养老院利用率地区差异的潜在因素。我们使用了涵盖所有老年护理依赖人群和所有养老院的综合行政数据。我们的分析方法包括在县一级使用线性回归模型,并考虑大量控制变量和固定效应。此外,我们通过应用空间滞后模型分析了地区依赖性。总之,我们的模型成功预测了高达73%的观察到的养老院利用率地区差异。关键因素包括护理需求、非正式护理支持的存在以及专业护理的供应。可以检测到空间依赖性,但在控制护理需求的情况下,其对这些差异的影响较小。值得注意的是,在一个拥有慷慨社会保险制度、为经济资源有限者提供护理的国家,诸如地区财富或农村性质等促成因素的影响非常有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/729de1ef8155/10198_2024_1732_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/66d0708b842f/10198_2024_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/1ef3f21adb68/10198_2024_1732_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/e9aead48291e/10198_2024_1732_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/602a2cd67635/10198_2024_1732_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/9a0c69554583/10198_2024_1732_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/a6fc1bd8603d/10198_2024_1732_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/27b6aaa6a6e2/10198_2024_1732_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/729de1ef8155/10198_2024_1732_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/66d0708b842f/10198_2024_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/1ef3f21adb68/10198_2024_1732_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/e9aead48291e/10198_2024_1732_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/602a2cd67635/10198_2024_1732_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/9a0c69554583/10198_2024_1732_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/a6fc1bd8603d/10198_2024_1732_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/27b6aaa6a6e2/10198_2024_1732_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c4/12204949/729de1ef8155/10198_2024_1732_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Regional variation in the utilization of nursing home care in Germany.德国养老院护理使用情况的地区差异。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jul;26(5):757-776. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01732-9. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.基于算法的养老院痴呆患者疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
3
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.为照顾居住在长期护理机构中的60岁及以上老人的医护人员接种流感疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 27;2(2):CD005187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6.
7
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
8
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub3.
9
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

引用本文的文献

1
Ikigai as a Personal Resource for Work Engagement: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Nursing Trainees in Germany.作为工作投入个人资源的“生き甲斐”:德国护理实习生的横断面研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 24;15(7):225. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070225.
2
The economics of home support services in Ireland: exploring complex issues of healthcare sustainability and aging populations.爱尔兰居家支持服务的经济学:探索医疗保健可持续性和老龄化人口的复杂问题。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 2;13:1602617. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1602617. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Regional medical practice variation in high-cost healthcare services : Evidence from diagnostic imaging in Austria.高成本医疗服务的区域医疗实践差异:来自奥地利诊断成像的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Aug;22(6):917-929. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01298-w. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
COVID-19 outbreak and Urban dynamics: regional variations in India.新冠疫情与城市动态:印度的地区差异
GeoJournal. 2022;87(4):2719-2737. doi: 10.1007/s10708-021-10394-6. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
Physician Beliefs and Patient Preferences: A New Look at Regional Variation in Health Care Spendingf.
医生的信念与患者的偏好:对医疗保健支出地区差异的新审视
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2019 Feb;11(1):192-221. doi: 10.1257/pol.20150421.
4
Regional variation in health care utilization and mortality.医疗保健利用和死亡率的地区差异。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102254. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102254. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Sources of regional variation in healthcare utilization in Germany.德国医疗保健利用的地区差异来源。
J Health Econ. 2020 Jan;69:102271. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102271. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
6
Do financial incentives influence the hospitalization rate of nursing home residents? Evidence from Germany.经济激励是否会影响养老院居民的住院率?来自德国的证据。
Health Econ. 2019 Nov;28(11):1235-1247. doi: 10.1002/hec.3930. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
7
SOURCES OF GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN HEALTH CARE: EVIDENCE FROM PATIENT MIGRATION.医疗保健地理差异的来源:患者迁移的证据。
Q J Econ. 2016 Nov;131(4):1681-1726. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw023. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
8
Public reporting and the quality of care of German nursing homes.
Health Policy. 2016 Oct;120(10):1162-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Higher prices, higher quality? Evidence from German nursing homes.价格越高,质量越好?来自德国养老院的证据。
Health Policy. 2016 Feb;120(2):179-89. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
10
Determinants of received long-term care - Individual responses to regional nursing home provisions.接受长期护理的决定因素——个人对地区养老院供应情况的反应。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Dec;19(4):326-337. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9333-3. Epub 2015 Jul 12.