• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向包容性结直肠癌筛查:智障成年人的经历与需求

Towards Inclusive Colorectal Cancer Screening: Experiences and Needs of Adults With Intellectual Disabilities.

作者信息

Wagner Theresa, Herscovici Alma R, Fuchs Amelie, Kabas Sebastian, Hilbert Mara, König Laura M, Unseld Matthias, Zeilinger Elisabeth L

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(17):e71212. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71212.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.71212
PMID:40905394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12409469/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care, resulting in delayed cancer diagnosis and higher mortality rates. There is limited understanding of the factors that influence their participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, particularly from their own perspectives. This study aimed to identify the barriers, facilitators, and needs of people with ID for an inclusive CRC screening programme from their own experiences and viewpoints.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups (N = 31) were conducted with adults with ID in Austria. Interviews and group discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used as a flexible method to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Five themes were identified from the data with each consisting of two to four sub-themes: (1) independence within individually adjusted scopes of arrangement and decision-making, (2) 'When it comes to health, I do it', (3) enhancing wellbeing, (4) seeing the person first, then their ID, and (5) deficits in resources and the healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

The findings reveal significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care for people with ID. The following practical implications were derived: Eliminating discrimination, improving accessibility, designing appropriate information and educational materials, implementing mandatory ID-specific training for health professionals, considering the importance of emotions and implementing ID-appropriate health services. Considering these aspects when developing inclusive cancer screening programmes is of paramount importance to promote equitable health and cancer prevention, especially for marginalised and vulnerable groups.

摘要

引言

智障人士在获得医疗保健和预防性癌症护理方面面临重大障碍,导致癌症诊断延迟和死亡率较高。对于影响他们参与结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的因素,尤其是从他们自身角度的了解有限。本研究旨在从智障人士自身的经历和观点出发,确定他们参与包容性CRC筛查计划的障碍、促进因素和需求。

方法

对奥地利的成年智障人士进行了半结构化定性访谈和焦点小组访谈(N = 31)。访谈和小组讨论进行了录音,并逐字转录。采用主题分析法作为灵活的方法来分析数据。

结果

从数据中确定了五个主题,每个主题由两到四个子主题组成:(1)在个体调整的安排和决策范围内的独立性,(2)“说到健康,我就去做”,(3)增进福祉,(4)先看人,再看其智障身份,(5)资源和医疗保健系统的不足。

结论

研究结果揭示了智障人士在获得医疗保健和预防性癌症护理方面的重大障碍。得出了以下实际意义:消除歧视、提高可及性、设计合适的信息和教育材料、为卫生专业人员开展针对智障人士的强制性培训、考虑情感的重要性以及实施适合智障人士的卫生服务。在制定包容性癌症筛查计划时考虑这些方面对于促进公平的健康和癌症预防至关重要,特别是对于边缘化和弱势群体而言。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3adc/12409469/0979f3e46108/CAM4-14-e71212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3adc/12409469/c2077d360533/CAM4-14-e71212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3adc/12409469/0979f3e46108/CAM4-14-e71212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3adc/12409469/c2077d360533/CAM4-14-e71212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3adc/12409469/0979f3e46108/CAM4-14-e71212-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards Inclusive Colorectal Cancer Screening: Experiences and Needs of Adults With Intellectual Disabilities.迈向包容性结直肠癌筛查:智障成年人的经历与需求
Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(17):e71212. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71212.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
"I feel like I'm not confident enough": A qualitative study of Cambodian midwives' experiences in disability-inclusive maternity care.“我觉得自己信心不足”:一项关于柬埔寨助产士在包容性残疾孕产妇护理方面经历的定性研究。
Midwifery. 2025 May 27;148:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104472.
4
Mental Healthcare Services for Persons With Communication Disorders: Experiences of Mental Health Professionals in Gauteng.为沟通障碍患者提供的精神卫生保健服务:豪登省精神卫生专业人员的经验
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70101. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70101.
5
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
7
All-Cause Mortality and Specific Causes of Death in Autism: A Nationwide Analysis.自闭症患者的全因死亡率及特定死因:一项全国性分析。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):81-92. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0103. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.

本文引用的文献

1
Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌筛查中的残疾与参与情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;31(11):7023-7039. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110517.
2
An invisible population: Late-stage cancer diagnosis for people with intellectual or developmental disability.一个隐形群体:智力或发育障碍患者的晚期癌症诊断
Cancer. 2024 Mar 1;130(5):668-670. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35132. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Stage IV breast, colorectal, and lung cancer at diagnosis in adults living with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based cross-sectional study.
智力或发育障碍成年人确诊时的IV期乳腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Cancer. 2024 Mar 1;130(5):740-749. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35068. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Advocacy for colorectal cancer screening and awareness in people with intellectual disability.倡导对智障人群进行结直肠癌筛查并提高其 awareness(此处“awareness”结合语境可能是指意识,比如对结直肠癌的认知意识 ,但原英文表述较模糊) 。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Jun 30;14(3):1650-1652. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-998. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Cancer in deceased adults with intellectual disabilities: English population-based study using linked data from three sources.患有智力残疾的成年人中的癌症:使用来自三个来源的链接数据进行的英国基于人群的研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 24;12(3):e056974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056974.
6
A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators influencing the cancer screening behaviour among people with intellectual disabilities.一项系统评价:影响智障人士癌症筛查行为的障碍和促进因素。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;76:102084. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102084. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
Cancer-related mortality among people with intellectual disabilities: A nationwide population-based cohort study.癌症相关死亡率在智力障碍人群中的表现:一项全国范围内基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1267-1274. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34030. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
An Overview of Intellectual Disability: Definition, Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports (12th ed.).《智力残疾概述:定义、诊断、分类及支持体系》(第12版)
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021 Nov 1;126(6):439-442. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-126.6.439.
9
Cancer risk in individuals with intellectual disability in Sweden: A population-based cohort study.瑞典智障个体的癌症风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 21;18(10):e1003840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003840. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
Barriers and facilitators to mammography among women with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative approach.智障女性进行乳房X光检查的障碍与促进因素:一种定性研究方法
Disabil Soc. 2020;35(8):1290-1314. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1680348. Epub 2019 Oct 31.