Bulbulia Joseph A
Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Oct 1;6:e41. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.32. eCollection 2024.
The analysis of 'moderation', 'interaction', 'mediation' and 'longitudinal growth' is widespread in the human sciences, yet subject to confusion. To clarify these concepts, it is essential to state causal estimands, which requires the specification of counterfactual contrasts for a target population on an appropriate scale. Once causal estimands are defined, we must consider their identification. I employ causal directed acyclic graphs and single world intervention graphs to elucidate identification workflows. I show that when multiple treatments exist, common methods for statistical inference, such as multi-level regressions and statistical structural equation models, cannot typically recover the causal quantities we seek. By properly framing and addressing causal questions of interaction, mediation, and time-varying treatments, we can expose the limitations of popular methods and guide researchers to a clearer understanding of the causal questions that animate our interests.
“调节”“交互作用”“中介作用”和“纵向增长”分析在人文科学中广泛应用,但容易造成混淆。为厘清这些概念,明确因果估计量至关重要,这需要在适当尺度上为目标人群指定反事实对照。一旦定义了因果估计量,我们就必须考虑其识别问题。我运用因果有向无环图和单世界干预图来阐释识别流程。我表明,当存在多种处理方式时,诸如多层回归和统计结构方程模型等常用统计推断方法通常无法得出我们所寻求的因果量。通过恰当地构建和解决交互作用、中介作用及时变处理的因果问题,我们能够揭示常用方法的局限性,并引导研究人员更清晰地理解激发我们兴趣的因果问题。