Otten Lucia Anna, Lama Subhiyeh, Otten Jakob Wilhelm, Winkler Kira, Ralser Damian Johannes, Egger Eva Katharina, Alexander Mustea
Clinic for Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Uniklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Gastroenterology, Hepatology, General Internal Medicine, Helios Klinikum Siegburg, Ringstraße 49, 53721, Siegburg, Germany.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May;311(5):1359-1369. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07818-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
Uterine fibroids pose clinical challenges due to varied symptoms and impact on fertility. Aim of this research is to compare open and laparoscopic myomectomy, with focus on evaluating their effects on patients' quality of life and analyzing their implications for pregnancy outcomes.
This retrospective study compares open and laparoscopic myomectomy outcomes in 168 patients treated October 2017 and July 2023. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes in terms of symptoms and pregnancy outcomes were examined.
The patient cohort comprised patients with a high symptom burden. Only 51.2% expressing a desire for future pregnancies, highlighting diverse motivations for uterus-preservation. No significant differences were observed in preoperative symptoms. Larger and multiple myomas were associated with a higher likelihood of laparotomy. Recurrence rates were lower after laparoscopy (10.2% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.02). Cesarean section recommendations were more frequent post-laparotomy group (36.6% vs. 86.6%, p = 0.000). Morbidities and satisfaction showed no significant differences between approaches, with slightly better bleeding improvement after laparotomy. Despite similar pregnancy outcomes, a high proportion of patients did not conceive postoperatively (75.4%). Among patients who became pregnant postoperatively (n = 31), most patients conceived after one year or more, with no dependence on the surgical approach (p = 0.227).
Both open and laparoscopic myomectomy surgeries showed high patient satisfaction, symptom alleviation, and comparable pregnancy results. A preference emerged for laparoscopy in terms of cesarean section recommendations and recurrence risk. Laparoscopic procedures tended to offer higher operative satisfaction and fewer complications. The study emphasized the complexity of therapeutic decision-making.
子宫肌瘤因症状多样且对生育有影响而带来临床挑战。本研究的目的是比较开腹子宫肌瘤切除术和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术,重点评估它们对患者生活质量的影响,并分析它们对妊娠结局的影响。
这项回顾性研究比较了2017年10月至2023年7月接受治疗的168例患者的开腹和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的结果。检查了术前特征以及症状和妊娠结局方面的术后结果。
患者队列包括症状负担较重的患者。只有51.2%的患者表示希望未来怀孕,这突出了保留子宫的多种动机。术前症状方面未观察到显著差异。较大和多发性肌瘤与开腹手术的可能性较高相关。腹腔镜检查后的复发率较低(10.2%对23.8%,p = 0.02)。开腹手术后剖宫产建议更频繁(36.6%对86.6%,p = 0.000)。两种手术方法在发病率和满意度方面没有显著差异,开腹手术后出血改善略好。尽管妊娠结局相似,但术后仍有很大比例的患者未受孕(75.4%)。在术后怀孕的患者(n = 31)中,大多数患者在一年或更长时间后怀孕,且不依赖手术方法(p = 0.227)。
开腹和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术均显示出较高的患者满意度、症状缓解以及相当的妊娠结果。在剖宫产建议和复发风险方面,腹腔镜检查更受青睐。腹腔镜手术往往提供更高的手术满意度和更少的并发症。该研究强调了治疗决策的复杂性。