• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼骨折前路手术后取出内固定物:一项具有挑战性但又必要的手术。

Removing hardware from anterior approaches following acetabular fractures: a challenging yet indicated procedure.

作者信息

Khalifa Ahmed, Fergany Ali, Ibrahim Bahaaeldin, Farouk Osama

机构信息

South Valley University, Qina, Egypt.

Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2025 Jan;49(1):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06383-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06383-2
PMID:39601814
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703930/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the indications, outcomes, and incidence of complications after hardware removal from anterior approaches following acetabular fractures.

MATERIALS

Over ten years, 13 patients were included, complaining of pain due to late infection in nine (69.2%) and secondary osteoarthritis in four (30.8%). Fractures classification were T-type fracture (46.2%), both columns (38.5%), one transverse (7.7%), and one (7.7%) T-type with a posterior wall. The approaches utilized for hardware removal were modified Stoppa in 11 (84.6%) patients, ilioinguinal lateral (iliac) window in nine (69.2%), Pararectus in one (7.7%), ilioinguinal in one (7.7%), and Kocher-Langenbeck approach in one (7.7%)).

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 37.1 ± 14.9 (21 to 65) years, and nine (69.2%) were males. Hardware removal was performed after the index surgery by a mean of 35.6 ± 20 months. The mean operative time was 143.8 ± 36 min, and the mean blood loss was 1573 ± 842 CC. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 ± 2.3 days, and all patients required blood transfusion. Four (30.8%) intraoperative complications, two (15.4%) vascular injuries, One (7.7%) urinary bladder injury, and in two (15.4%) broken screws could not be retrieved. Postoperative complications in five (38.5%): three (23.1%) had superficial wound infection, one (7.7%) had DVT, and one (7.7%) had L5 nerve root injury. After a mean follow up of 11.3 ± 4.4 (6 to 20) months, the VAS score decreased from a preoperative median of 6 (2 to 8) to a median score of 1 (0 to 6) at the last follow up. 11 (84.6%) patients described the pain as none or occasional, and eight (61.5%) were very satisfied with the results.

CONCLUSION

Hardware removal from the anterior approaches after acetabular fractures is demanding and carries a high complication risk. The surgeries should be performed when highly indicated, and the surgical team must be familiar with the anterior approaches.

摘要

目的

描述髋臼骨折前路内固定物取出术后的适应证、治疗结果及并发症发生率。

材料

在十年间纳入了13例患者,其中9例(69.2%)因晚期感染而疼痛,4例(30.8%)因继发性骨关节炎而疼痛。骨折类型为T型骨折(46.2%)、双柱骨折(38.5%)、单横形骨折(7.7%)以及1例(7.7%)合并后壁的T型骨折。11例(84.6%)患者采用改良Stoppa入路取出内固定物,9例(69.2%)采用髂腹股沟外侧(髂骨)窗入路,1例(7.7%)采用腹直肌旁入路,1例(7.7%)采用髂腹股沟入路,1例(7.7%)采用Kocher-Langenbeck入路。

结果

患者平均年龄为37.1±14.9(21至65)岁,9例(69.2%)为男性。在内固定术后平均35.6±20个月取出内固定物。平均手术时间为143.8±36分钟,平均失血量为1573±842毫升。平均住院时间为3.2±2.3天,所有患者均需要输血。术中并发症4例(30.8%),其中血管损伤2例(15.4%),膀胱损伤1例(7.7%),2例(15.4%)断钉无法取出。术后并发症5例(38.5%):3例(23.1%)发生浅表伤口感染,1例(7.7%)发生深静脉血栓,1例(7.7%)发生L5神经根损伤。平均随访11.3±4.4(6至20)个月后,视觉模拟评分(VAS)从术前中位数6分(2至8分)降至末次随访时的中位数1分(0至6分)。11例(84.6%)患者表示疼痛消失或偶尔出现,8例(61.5%)对结果非常满意。

结论

髋臼骨折前路取出内固定物手术难度大,并发症风险高。手术应在严格适应证下进行,手术团队必须熟悉前路手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/021c34ac0b53/264_2024_6383_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/64816ae30864/264_2024_6383_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/3aac7c5df525/264_2024_6383_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/0efdae8e2811/264_2024_6383_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/91ce21d49333/264_2024_6383_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/021c34ac0b53/264_2024_6383_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/64816ae30864/264_2024_6383_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/3aac7c5df525/264_2024_6383_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/0efdae8e2811/264_2024_6383_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/91ce21d49333/264_2024_6383_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbdf/11703930/021c34ac0b53/264_2024_6383_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Removing hardware from anterior approaches following acetabular fractures: a challenging yet indicated procedure.髋臼骨折前路手术后取出内固定物:一项具有挑战性但又必要的手术。
Int Orthop. 2025 Jan;49(1):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06383-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Anterior Combined Endopelvic (ACE) approach for the treatment of acetabular and pelvic ring fractures: A new proposal.用于治疗髋臼和骨盆环骨折的前路联合盆腔内(ACE)入路:一项新提议。
Injury. 2014 Dec;45 Suppl 6:S9-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
3
[Short-term effectiveness of reconstruction plate internal fixation via improved Stoppa approach combined with iliac fossa approach and Kocher-Langenbeck approach for complex acetabular fractures].改良Stoppa入路联合髂窝入路及Kocher-Langenbeck入路重建钢板内固定治疗复杂髋臼骨折的短期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Dec 15;36(12):1453-1458. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202206104.
4
[Surgical treatment of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures using the Stoppa approach].[采用Stoppa入路治疗骨盆环和髋臼骨折]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):93-8.
5
The anterior intra-pelvic (modified rives-stoppa) approach for fixation of acetabular fractures.经改良的髂耻入路(Rives-Stoppa 入路)在髋臼骨折内固定术中的应用。
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):263-70. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181dd0b84.
6
Modified Stoppa as an alternative surgical approach for fixation of anterior fracture acetabulum: a randomized control clinical trial.改良 Stoppa 入路治疗前柱髋臼骨折内固定的随机对照临床试验
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Apr 17;15(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01660-3.
7
Does the pararectus approach have better outcomes and fewer complications than the modified Stoppa approach for the fixation of acetabular fractures in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis?经腹膜外入路与改良Stoppa 入路治疗成人髋臼骨折内固定的疗效和并发症比较:系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3409-3421. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03885-y. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
8
Treatment of acetabulum fractures through the modified Stoppa approach: strategies and outcomes.经改良Stoppa入路治疗髋臼骨折:策略与结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3345-52. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3460-x.
9
The Short- and Mid-term Follow-Up of Single-Column Fixation in Transverse and Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures.单纯后柱或后柱加横行固定治疗髋臼横形及后壁骨折的中短期随访结果
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/os.12968. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
10
[MODIFIED Stoppa APPROACH WITH MEDIAL WALL SPRING PLATE FOR INVOLVING QUADRILATERAL OF ACETABULUM FRACTURE].[改良 Stoppa 入路联合内侧壁弹簧钢板治疗累及髋臼四边形区骨折]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Mar;29(3):270-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Conversion total hip replacement with hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum: insights from two case reports.髋臼切开复位内固定术后取出内固定物的全髋关节置换翻修术:两例病例报告的见解
J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jul 7;2025(7):rjaf475. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf475. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Iatrogenic Bladder Rupture Resulting From the Modified Stoppa Approach for Acetabular Fracture: A Case Report.改良Stoppa入路治疗髋臼骨折导致的医源性膀胱破裂:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66207. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66207. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Intraoperative computerised tomography scan for percutaneous fixation of the pelvis: a retrospective case series.术中计算机断层扫描在骨盆经皮固定中的应用:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Oct;48(10):2743-2748. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06265-7. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
The optimal fluoroscopic views to rule out intra-articular screw penetration during acetabular fracture fixation.
评估髋臼骨折固定术中关节内螺钉穿透的最佳透视位。
Int Orthop. 2024 Jan;48(1):243-252. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-06002-6. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
4
Surgical site infections after stabilization of pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective analysis of risk factors and a meta-analysis of similar studies.骨盆环损伤稳定后的手术部位感染:危险因素的回顾性分析和类似研究的荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2023 May;47(5):1331-1344. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05719-8. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
5
Treatment of acetabular fracture involving anterior and posterior columns using a single pararectus approach: surgical experience and preliminary results.采用单一腹直肌旁入路治疗累及前后柱的髋臼骨折:手术经验及初步结果
Int Orthop. 2023 Jan;47(1):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05587-8. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
6
Complications after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a 5-year follow-up of 229 patients.手术治疗髋臼骨折的并发症:229 例患者的 5 年随访结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1245-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03284-1. Epub 2022 May 20.
7
Ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 717 patients across ten studies.髂腹股沟入路与改良 Stoppa 入路治疗移位髋臼骨折的切开复位内固定:十项研究中 717 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Feb;143(2):895-907. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04369-6. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
8
Management of anterior associated types of acetabular fractures utilizing the modified Stoppa and the pararectus approaches: a prospective cohort study and early experience from a level one Egyptian trauma centre.利用改良Stoppa入路和腹直肌旁入路治疗髋臼前联合型骨折:一项前瞻性队列研究及来自埃及一级创伤中心的早期经验
Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):897-909. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05293-x. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
9
Elective removal vs. retaining of hardware after osteosynthesis in asymptomatic patients-a scoping review.无症状患者骨折内固定术后选择性取出与保留内固定物的比较:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 2;9(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01488-2.
10
Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture surgery.髋臼骨折手术后的全髋关节置换术。
Int Orthop. 2021 Apr;45(4):871-876. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04676-w. Epub 2020 Jul 2.