Suppr超能文献

表面引导放射治疗系统的动态精度和延迟评估

Evaluation of dynamic accuracy and latency of a surface-guided radiotherapy system.

作者信息

Yamauchi Ryohei, Tomita Fumihiro

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

出版信息

Radiol Phys Technol. 2025 Mar;18(1):136-146. doi: 10.1007/s12194-024-00866-y. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the dynamic accuracy and latency of the surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system using TrueBeam and AlignRT in compliance with SGRT guidelines. Beam characteristics-flatness, symmetry, beam quality, and output-were compared between gated and nongated beams using a two-dimensional ionization chamber array and a Farmer-type chamber. Dynamic accuracy was assessed using a moving platform and breast phantom, with measurements taken for various shift values (5, 10, 30 mm), region-of-interest (ROI) shapes, reference-surface image types (DICOM and capture), surface resolutions, and room illuminations. Latency due to differences in frame rates was evaluated using radiochromic film, calculated from position displacements of profiles at two speeds. Differences in beam characteristics between gated and nongated beams were within 0.1%. Dynamic accuracy showed minimal dependence on settings, with deviations of < 1 mm for a 10-mm shift. A maximum displacement of 1.9 mm was observed with a 30-mm shift at the body ROI. Beam-on latency at 12, 16, 25, and 35 frames per second was 253.2 ± 21.9, 225.7 ± 33.7, 177.1 ± 43.0, and 112.4 ± 29.2 ms, respectively, with similar trends for beam-off latency. This study is the first to evaluate the dynamic accuracy of the TrueBeam and AlignRT system under SGRT-specific settings. While accuracy was generally maintained (< 1 mm), ROI shape significantly impacted results. Latency results indicate that certain frame rates may not meet guideline limits, underscoring the need for careful SGRT system use in clinical applications.

摘要

本研究的目的是根据表面引导放射治疗(SGRT)指南,评估使用TrueBeam和AlignRT的SGRT系统的动态准确性和延迟。使用二维电离室阵列和Farmer型电离室,比较门控束和非门控束之间的射束特性——平坦度、对称性、射束质量和输出。使用移动平台和乳房体模评估动态准确性,针对各种位移值(5、10、30毫米)、感兴趣区域(ROI)形状、参考表面图像类型(DICOM和捕获)、表面分辨率和室内照明进行测量。使用放射变色胶片评估由于帧率差异导致的延迟,根据两种速度下轮廓的位置位移计算得出。门控束和非门控束之间的射束特性差异在0.1%以内。动态准确性对设置的依赖性最小,10毫米位移时偏差<1毫米。在身体ROI处30毫米位移时观察到最大位移为1.9毫米。每秒12、16、25和35帧时的束开启延迟分别为253.2±21.9、225.7±33.7、177.1±43.0和112.4±29.2毫秒,束关闭延迟趋势相似。本研究首次在SGRT特定设置下评估TrueBeam和AlignRT系统的动态准确性。虽然准确性总体上保持在<1毫米,但ROI形状对结果有显著影响。延迟结果表明,某些帧率可能不符合指南限制,强调在临床应用中谨慎使用SGRT系统的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验