Şişik Abdullah, Dalkılıç Muhammed Said, Gençtürk Mehmet, Yılmaz Merih, Erdem Hasan, Nguyen Ninh T
Health Sciences Faculty, Gedik University Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dr. HE Obesity Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07610-w. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common adverse effect after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Identifying patients with preexisting GERD is critical for preoperative planning. The American Foregut Society (AFS) recently proposed a new endoscopic classification system for objective assessment of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) integrity, building upon the Hill classification. Grade 1 represents an intact EGJ, while grades 2, 3, and 4 represent partial, moderate, and complete disruption of the ARB. Unlike Hill classification, the AFS classification includes objective measurement of hiatal axial length and aperture diameter. The study aimed to evaluate the ability of the AFS hiatus classification to predict GERD severity using symptom questionnaires.
We performed a prospective study of obese patients who underwent endoscopy as work-up for MBS. The endoscopy was evaluated for esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and AFS grade. All patients were also surveyed preoperatively with the GERD-HRQL, GerdQ, and RSI. The correlation between AFS grades and questionnaire scores was analyzed using Spearman's test.
A total of 393 patients were included in the study. There were 81% female, with a mean age of 36 ± 10.7 years and a mean BMI of 41.7 ± 7.2 kg/m. The AFS grades were distributed as follows: 11 (2.8%) patients had grade 1; 137 (34.9%) had grade 2; 162 (41.2%) had grade 3; and 83 (21.1%) had grade 4. There was a positive but weak correlation between AFS grades and all scoring systems, including GERD-HRQL (r = 0.201), heartburn (r = 0.203), regurgitation (r = 0.212), RSI (r = 0.110), and GerdQ scores (r = 0.202). However, the proportion of patients with esophagitis increased progressively with increasing grades (0% in grade 1, 2.2% in grade 2, 9.9% in grade 3, and 32.5% in grade 4, p = 0.01).
The AFS hiatus classification can stratify the population with obesity based on rate of esophagitis and symptom scores. This study supports the practical utility of the AFS classification as an adjunct in the detection of patients who are at risk for GERD after MBS. Further validation studies with pH testing are needed.
胃食管反流病(GERD)是代谢和减重手术后常见的不良反应。识别术前已存在GERD的患者对于术前规划至关重要。美国前肠协会(AFS)最近在希尔分类的基础上,提出了一种新的内镜分类系统,用于客观评估食管胃交界(EGJ)的完整性。1级表示EGJ完整,而2级、3级和4级分别表示抗反流屏障(ARB)部分、中度和完全破坏。与希尔分类不同,AFS分类包括对裂孔轴向长度和孔径的客观测量。本研究旨在使用症状问卷评估AFS裂孔分类预测GERD严重程度的能力。
我们对接受内镜检查以进行减重手术评估的肥胖患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。对内镜检查结果进行食管炎、巴雷特食管和AFS分级评估。所有患者术前还接受了GERD-HRQL、GerdQ和反流症状指数(RSI)调查。使用Spearman检验分析AFS分级与问卷评分之间的相关性。
本研究共纳入393例患者。其中81%为女性,平均年龄36±10.7岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为41.7±7.2kg/m²。AFS分级分布如下:11例(2.8%)患者为1级;137例(34.9%)为2级;162例(41.2%)为3级;以及83例(21.1%)为4级。AFS分级与所有评分系统之间存在正相关但较弱,包括GERD-HRQL(r = 0.201)、烧心(r = 0.203)、反流(r = 0.212)、RSI(r = 0.110)和GerdQ评分(r = 0.202)。然而,食管炎患者的比例随着分级增加而逐渐升高(1级为0%,2级为2.2%,3级为9.9%,4级为32.5%,p = 0.01)。
AFS裂孔分类可根据食管炎发生率和症状评分对肥胖人群进行分层。本研究支持AFS分类作为检测减重手术后GERD风险患者的辅助手段的实际效用。需要进一步进行pH测试的验证研究。