Rodriguez Espinosa Patricia, Peña Juan M, Devia Carlos, Boursaw Blake, Avila Magdalena, Rudametkin Diana, Aguilar-Gaxiola Sergio, Alegria Margarita, Soto de Laurido Lourdes E, Acosta Pérez Edna, Wallerstein Nina
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Office of Community Engagement, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 16;8(1):e165. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.613. eCollection 2024.
Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) and Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) require validated measures and metrics for evaluating research partnerships and outcomes. There is a need to adapt and translate existing measures for practical use with diverse and non-English-speaking communities. This paper describes the Spanish translation and adaptation of Engage for Equity's Community Engagement Survey (E CES), a nationally validated and empirically-supported CEnR evaluation tool, into the full-length "," and a pragmatic shorter version "" (FUERTES).
Community and academic partners from the mainland US, Puerto Rico, and Nicaragua participated in translating and adapting E CES, preserving content validity, psychometric properties, and importance to stakeholders of items, scales, and CBPR constructs (contexts, partnership processes, intervention and research actions, and outcomes). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and convergent validity was assessed via a correlation matrix among scales.
respondents ( = 57) self-identified as primarily Latinos/as/x (97%), female (74%), and academics (61%). Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.72 to 0.88 for items in the context domain to 0.90-0.92 for items in the intervention/research domain. Correlations were found as expected among subscales, with the strongest relationships found for subscales within the same CBPR domain. Results informed the creation of FUERTES.
and FUERTES offer CEnR/CBPR practitioners two validated instruments for assessing their research partnering practices, and outcomes. Moreover, FUERTES meets the need for shorter pragmatic tools. These measures can further strengthen CEnR/CBPR involving Latino/a/x communities within the US, Latin America, and globally.
社区参与式研究(CEnR)和基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)需要经过验证的措施和指标来评估研究伙伴关系及成果。有必要对现有措施进行调整和翻译,以便在不同的非英语社区实际使用。本文介绍了将“公平参与社区参与度调查”(E CES)——一种经过全国验证且有实证支持的CEnR评估工具——翻译成西班牙语并进行调整,形成完整版“ ”以及实用的简短版本“FUERTES”的过程。
来自美国大陆、波多黎各和尼加拉瓜的社区和学术伙伴参与了E CES的翻译和调整工作,保留了内容效度、心理测量特性以及项目、量表和CBPR构建要素(背景、伙伴关系过程、干预和研究行动以及成果)对利益相关者的重要性。使用克朗巴哈系数评估内部一致性,并通过量表之间的相关矩阵评估收敛效度。
名受访者( = 57)自我认定主要为拉丁裔(97%)、女性(74%)和学者(61%)。背景领域项目的克朗巴哈系数值范围为0.72至0.88,干预/研究领域项目的克朗巴哈系数值为0.90 - 0.92。各子量表之间的相关性符合预期,在同一CBPR领域内的子量表之间发现了最强的关系。这些结果为创建FUERTES提供了依据。
和FUERTES为CEnR/CBPR从业者提供了两种经过验证的工具,用于评估他们的研究伙伴关系实践及成果。此外,FUERTES满足了对更简短实用工具的需求。这些措施可以进一步加强在美国、拉丁美洲及全球范围内涉及拉丁裔社区的CEnR/CBPR。