Acker Stein, Liang Jinqing, Sinaii Ninet, Wingert Kristen, Kurosu Atsuko, Rajan Sunder, Inati Sara, Theodore William H, Biassou Nadia
The Integrative Neuroscience of Communication Unit, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Service, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2024 Nov 15;18:1471229. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1471229. eCollection 2024.
Functional connectivity (FC) refers to the activation correlation between different brain regions. FC networks as typically represented as graphs with brain regions of interest (ROIs) as nodes and functional correlation as edges. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are machine learning architectures used to analyze FC graphs. However, traditional GNNs are limited in their ability to characterize FC edge attributes because they typically emphasize the importance of ROI node-based brain activation data. Line GNNs convert the edges of the original graph to nodes in the transformed graph, thereby emphasizing the FC between brain regions. We hypothesize that line GNNs will outperform traditional GNNs in FC applications. We investigated the performance of two common GNN architectures (GraphSAGE and GCN) trained on line and traditional graphs predicting task-associated FC changes across two datasets. The first dataset was from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) with 205 participants, the second was a dataset with 12 participants. The HCP dataset detailed FC changes in participants during a story-listening task, while the second dataset included the FC changes in a different auditory language task. Our findings from the HCP dataset indicated that line GNNs achieved lower mean squared error compared to traditional GNNs, with the line GraphSAGE model outperforming the traditional GraphSAGE by 18% ( < 0.0001). When applying the same models to the second dataset, both line GNNs also showed statistically significant improvements over their traditional counterparts with little to no overfitting. We believe this shows that line GNN models demonstrate promising utility in FC studies.
功能连接性(FC)是指不同脑区之间的激活相关性。FC网络通常表示为以感兴趣的脑区(ROI)为节点、功能相关性为边的图。图神经网络(GNN)是用于分析FC图的机器学习架构。然而,传统的GNN在表征FC边属性方面能力有限,因为它们通常强调基于ROI节点的脑激活数据的重要性。线性GNN将原始图的边转换为变换后图中的节点,从而强调脑区之间的FC。我们假设线性GNN在FC应用中将优于传统GNN。我们研究了在预测两个数据集上与任务相关的FC变化的线性图和传统图上训练的两种常见GNN架构(GraphSAGE和GCN)的性能。第一个数据集来自人类连接组计划(HCP),有205名参与者,第二个数据集有12名参与者。HCP数据集详细记录了参与者在听故事任务期间的FC变化,而第二个数据集包括不同听觉语言任务中的FC变化。我们从HCP数据集得出的结果表明,与传统GNN相比,线性GNN实现了更低的均方误差,线性GraphSAGE模型比传统GraphSAGE模型的性能高出18%(<0.0001)。当将相同的模型应用于第二个数据集时,两个线性GNN也比其传统对应模型在统计上有显著改进,几乎没有过拟合。我们认为这表明线性GNN模型在FC研究中显示出有前景的效用。