Attri Sarina A, Springer Andrew E, Chen Baojiang, Kelder Steven H, Mantey Dale S
The University of Texas at Austin, 110 Inner Campus Drive, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Nov 9;13:100296. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100296. eCollection 2024 Dec.
E-cigarette use remains high among adolescents, underscoring the need to identify targetable risk factors for intervention. This study examines associations between two social norms constructs (prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability) and at-risk status for e-cigarette use among Texas early adolescents.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the CATCH My Breath study, which included n=1032 Texas sixth graders. Students who had ever used or were susceptible to using e-cigarettes were categorized as at-risk for long-term use. Susceptibility was measured using a 3-item index assessing curiosity, intentions, and receptivity to using e-cigarettes. Multi-level logistic regressions assessed associations between social norm constructs and at-risk status for the full and sex-stratified samples. Covariates were race, ethnicity, academics, household/peer tobacco use.
Overall, 36 % of 6th grade students were at-risk for e-cigarette use. Approximately 49 % of students overestimated peer e-cigarette use ("prevalence misperceptions"), and 43 % believed adolescent e-cigarette use is highly acceptable ("social acceptability"). Controlling for covariates, students with medium (aOR=1.89; 95 %CI=1.35-2.65) and high (aOR=1.98; 95 %CI=1.41-2.78) prevalence misperceptions had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those with low misperceptions. Students reporting medium (aOR=2.50; 95 %CI=1.66-3.76) and high (aOR=4.70; 95 %CI=3.21-6.90) social acceptability had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those reporting low acceptability. This association was stronger for females, relative to males.
Greater prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability were associated with being at-risk for e-cigarette use among this sample of Texas early adolescents. Interventions should consider incorporating these social norms into intervention content.
青少年中电子烟使用率依然很高,这凸显了识别可干预的风险因素的必要性。本研究调查了两种社会规范结构(流行率误判和社会可接受性)与得克萨斯州青少年电子烟使用风险状况之间的关联。
我们对“关注我的呼吸”研究的基线数据进行了横断面分析,该研究纳入了1032名得克萨斯州六年级学生。曾经使用过或易使用电子烟的学生被归类为长期使用的风险人群。易感性通过一个包含3个条目的指数来衡量,该指数评估对使用电子烟的好奇心、意图和接受程度。多水平逻辑回归分析了社会规范结构与全样本及按性别分层样本的风险状况之间的关联。协变量包括种族、民族、学业成绩、家庭/同伴烟草使用情况。
总体而言,36%的六年级学生有电子烟使用风险。约49%的学生高估了同伴的电子烟使用率(“流行率误判”),43%的学生认为青少年使用电子烟是完全可以接受的(“社会可接受性”)。在控制协变量后,流行率误判为中等(调整优势比[aOR]=1.89;95%置信区间[CI]=1.35 - 2.65)和高(aOR=1.98;95%CI=1.41 - 2.78)的学生,与误判率低的学生相比,使用电子烟的风险更高。报告社会可接受性为中等(aOR=2.50;95%CI=1.66 - 3.76)和高(aOR=4.70;95%CI=3.21 - 6.90)的学生,与报告可接受性低的学生相比,使用电子烟的风险更高。相对于男性,这种关联在女性中更强。
在这个得克萨斯州青少年样本中,更高的流行率误判和社会可接受性与电子烟使用风险相关。干预措施应考虑将这些社会规范纳入干预内容。