Nielson Spencer A, Boyle Julia T, Dautovich Natalie D, Dzierzewski Joseph M
Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States.
Office of Research and Development, VA Boston Healthcare System, United States; New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Sleep Med Rev. 2025 Apr;80:102032. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102032. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
A burgeoning area of research is investigating whether beliefs and attitudes about sleep are associated with sleep duration in individuals without clinical conditions (e.g., insomnia, depression, anxiety, chronic pain). This review sought to examine and synthesize the extant research in non-clinical samples. A systematic review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines was conducted between March 2024 and May 2024, with 2204 studies screened. Study quality was assessed using NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Controlled Intervention Studies. Seventeen articles met eligibility criteria. All studies were classified as "fair" or "poor" quality. Studies generally demonstrated that more favorable attitudes and beliefs were associated with appropriate sleep duration. Specific beliefs related to sleep may be differentially associated with sleep duration. Preliminary evidence demonstrated that demographic factors may modify this association. Favorable attitudes toward sleep may be associated with more appropriate sleep duration among individuals without clinical conditions. However, the quality of the extant research was rated poorly, demonstrating a need for additional, higher quality studies. Future studies should consider this relationship while considering demographic factors as this may have important implications for public sleep health efforts.
一个新兴的研究领域正在探究,对于没有临床疾病(如失眠、抑郁、焦虑、慢性疼痛)的个体而言,关于睡眠的信念和态度是否与睡眠时间相关。本综述旨在审视和综合非临床样本中的现有研究。2024年3月至2024年5月期间,按照PRISMA指南对文献进行了系统综述,共筛选了2204项研究。使用美国国立卫生研究院的队列研究和横断面研究质量评估工具以及美国国立卫生研究院的对照干预研究质量评估工具对研究质量进行了评估。17篇文章符合纳入标准。所有研究的质量均被归类为“中等”或“较差”。研究普遍表明,更积极的态度和信念与适当的睡眠时间相关。与睡眠相关的特定信念可能与睡眠时间存在不同的关联。初步证据表明,人口统计学因素可能会改变这种关联。在没有临床疾病的个体中,对睡眠的积极态度可能与更适当的睡眠时间相关。然而,现有研究的质量评级较差,表明需要更多高质量的研究。未来的研究在考虑人口统计学因素时应考虑这种关系,因为这可能对公众睡眠健康工作具有重要意义。