• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Experiences of Research Coproduction in Uganda Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact".乌干达研究合作生产的经验 评《研究合作生产:一条未充分利用的影响途径》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024 Nov 20;13. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8806.
2
Research Coproduction: How Can Coproduction Teams Increase Traffic on the Pathway to Impact? Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact".研究共同生产:共同生产团队如何增加通向影响力之路的流量?对《研究共同生产:一条未充分利用的通向影响力之路》的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8804. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8804. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Nottingham Trent University and Makerere University School of Public Health partnership: experiences of co-learning and supporting the healthcare system in Uganda.诺丁汉特伦特大学与马凯雷雷大学公共卫生学院的合作:在乌干达共同学习与支持医疗系统的经验
Global Health. 2016 Mar 28;12:11. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0148-x.
4
Challenges and opportunities in coproduction: reflections on working with young people to develop an intervention to prevent violence in informal settlements in South Africa.共同创作面临的挑战与机遇:与年轻人合作制定干预措施以预防南非非正规住区暴力的反思。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011463.
5
Nothing about us, without us: is for us.没有我们的参与,就没有关于我们的一切:这是为了我们。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 4;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00372-8.
6
Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact.研究合作产出:一种未被充分利用的影响途径。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8461. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8461. Epub 2024 May 21.
7
Coproduction for feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trials: learning outcomes for community partners, service users and the research team.可行性和试点随机对照试验的共同生产:社区合作伙伴、服务使用者和研究团队的学习成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 8;4:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0116-0. eCollection 2018.
8
Interventions to improve system-level coproduction in the Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network.改善囊性纤维化学习网络中系统层面共同生产的干预措施。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jul 27;13(3):e002860. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002860.
9
Evidencing the Impact of Web-Based Coproduction With Youth on Mental Health Research: Qualitative Findings From the MindKind Study.基于网络的青少年共同创作对心理健康研究影响的证据:MindKind 研究的定性发现。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 19;9:e42963. doi: 10.2196/42963.
10
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinforcing the Research Coproduction Impact Pathway: A Response to Recent Commentaries.加强研究共同生产影响路径:对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9302. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.9302. Epub 2025 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact.研究合作产出:一种未被充分利用的影响途径。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8461. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8461. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Facilitators and barriers to integrated malaria prevention in Wakiso district, Uganda: A photovoice study.乌干达瓦基索区综合疟疾预防的促进因素与障碍:一项摄影声音研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Apr 16;4(4):e0002469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002469. eCollection 2024.
3
Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review.英国资助的应用健康研究中的共同生产实践和未来研究重点:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00838-x.
4
Why and for whom are we decolonising global health?我们为何要使全球卫生摆脱殖民色彩,又是为谁这样做?
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1359-e1360. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00317-X.
5
More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production.不止是一种方法:信任关系、建设性冲突以及双向学习作为真正共同生产的机制
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 31;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5.
6
Use of photovoice to explore the potential role of youth in contributing to maternal health in rural Wakiso district, Uganda.运用摄影法探索乌干达瓦基索区农村青年在促进孕产妇健康方面的潜在作用。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1854152. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1854152.
7
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
8
Reflecting strategic and conforming gendered experiences of community health workers using photovoice in rural Wakiso district, Uganda.用影像方法在乌干达瓦基索农村地区反映社区卫生工作者的战略性和符合性别特点的经历
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Aug 22;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0306-8.
9
Community-institutional partnerships: understanding trust among partners.社区-机构伙伴关系:理解伙伴之间的信任
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Apr;36(2):334-47. doi: 10.1177/1090198107305079. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

乌干达研究合作生产的经验 评《研究合作生产:一条未充分利用的影响途径》

Experiences of Research Coproduction in Uganda Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact".

作者信息

Musoke David, Nakalawa Suzan, Brown Michael Obeng, Lubega Grace Biyinzika, Gibson Linda

机构信息

Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Institute of Health and Allied Professions, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024 Nov 20;13. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8806.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.8806
PMID:39624867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11806215/
Abstract

This commentary reflects on the principles of research coproduction discussed by Rycroft-Malone et al through our experiences in Uganda, particularly within the partnership between Nottingham Trent University (UK) and Makerere University (Uganda). The commentary highlights the coproduction process we have employed in community health projects in Wakiso district, Uganda, by examining both the opportunities and challenges inherent in this collaborative approach. We further highlight the importance of continuous stakeholder engagement, contextspecific communication, and power-sharing, demonstrating how research coproduction can decolonize research methodologies and enhance the relevance and impact of health interventions. By recognising the inequities between North-South partnerships, this commentary contributes to the discourse on how research coproduction can practically be implemented to drive meaningful, community-centred change while addressing the complexities involved. The lessons drawn from our experiences offer a pathway for other global partnerships aiming to integrate the principles of research coproduction into their work.

摘要

本评论通过我们在乌干达的经历,特别是通过英国诺丁汉特伦特大学与乌干达马凯雷雷大学之间的合作,对Rycroft-Malone等人所讨论的研究共同生产原则进行了反思。该评论通过审视这种合作方式所固有的机遇和挑战,突出了我们在乌干达瓦基索区社区卫生项目中采用的共同生产过程。我们进一步强调了持续的利益相关者参与、因地制宜的沟通和权力共享的重要性,展示了研究共同生产如何能够使研究方法非殖民化,并提高卫生干预措施的相关性和影响力。通过认识到南北伙伴关系之间的不平等,本评论为关于如何切实实施研究共同生产以推动有意义的、以社区为中心的变革同时应对其中所涉及的复杂性的讨论做出了贡献。从我们的经验中汲取的教训为其他旨在将研究共同生产原则融入其工作的全球伙伴关系提供了一条途径。