• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《攻击行为生活史中文版在精神分裂症患者评估中的信效度》

Reliability and Validity of the Life History of Aggression-Chinese Version in Schizophrenia Patients Assessment.

作者信息

Chen Xia-Can, Yang Qin, Zhang Qin-Ting, Ouyang Ai-Li, Xu Jia-Jun, Yang Rui, Wang Zi-Ye, Zhai Jin-Hui, Li Yan, Qin Xiao-Rong, Hu Jun-Mei

机构信息

West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 610036, China.

出版信息

Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 25;40(4):352-358. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.130602.

DOI:10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.130602
PMID:39625200
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To provide a longitudinal evaluation tool based on the frequency of aggressive behavior for the aggression assessment of schizophrenia patients.

METHODS

The Life History of Aggression was translated and revised to form the Life History of Aggression-Chinese Version (LHA-CV) based on 369 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in the Chengdu community and compulsory medical institution. The reliability of LHA-CV was analyzed by means of split-half reliability, test-retest reliability and inter-evaluator consistency. The validity was analyzed by item analysis, construct validity and criterion validity.

RESULTS

Item analysis found that LHA-CV had good homogeneity and discriminant validity. Exploratory factor analysis found that the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test value was 0.80, and the Bartlett's sphericity test =1 203.46 (<0.05), and it revealed four factors including non-physical aggression, physical aggression, self-directed aggression and antisocial behavior/consequences. The factor loadings for all 11 items were greater than 0.40. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the factor model, Chi-square degree of freedom (/df) was 3.61, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.07, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) was 0.92, comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.90, incremental fit index (IFI) was 0.90, and the discriminant validity of each factor was good. The criterion validity test showed the total score of LHA-CV was positively correlated with the aggressive behavior level of MacArthur Community Violence Instrument, the total score of Buss-Perry Aggression Scale, and the score of Antisocial Personality Disorder Subscale of Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4th Edition Plus (PDQ-4+_ASPD, <0.05). The Cronbach's coefficient of non-physical aggression, physical aggression, self-directed aggression, antisocial behavior/consequences and LHA-CV total score were 0.82, 0.73, 0.74, 0.56 and 0.79, respectively. The test-retest reliability, Spearman-Brown split-half reliability and intra-class correlation coefficient of LHA-CV total score were 0.82 (<0.05), 0.66 and 0.99, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LHA-CV has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an evaluation tool for longitudinally assessing aggressive behavior in schizophrenia patients.

摘要

目的

提供一种基于攻击行为频率的纵向评估工具,用于评估精神分裂症患者的攻击行为。

方法

对369名来自成都社区及强制医疗机构、被诊断为精神分裂症的患者,翻译并修订《攻击行为生活史》,形成《攻击行为生活史中文版》(LHA-CV)。通过分半信度、重测信度和评估者间一致性分析LHA-CV的信度,通过项目分析、结构效度和效标效度分析其效度。

结果

项目分析发现LHA-CV具有良好的同质性和区分效度。探索性因素分析发现,Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)检验值为0.80,Bartlett球形检验=1203.46(<0.05),揭示了包括非身体攻击、身体攻击、自我导向攻击和反社会行为/后果在内的四个因素。所有11个项目的因子载荷均大于0.40。对因子模型进行验证性因素分析,卡方自由度(/df)为3.61,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.07,拟合优度指数(GFI)为0.92,比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.90,增值拟合指数(IFI)为0.90,各因子的区分效度良好。效标效度检验显示,LHA-CV总分与《麦克阿瑟社区暴力量表》的攻击行为水平、《布斯-佩里攻击量表》总分以及《人格诊断问卷第4版升级版反社会人格障碍分量表》(PDQ-4+_ASPD)得分呈正相关(<0.05)。非身体攻击、身体攻击、自我导向攻击、反社会行为/后果及LHA-CV总分的Cronbach's系数分别为0.82、0.7,3、0.74、0.56和0.79。LHA-CV总分的重测信度、Spearman-Brown分半信度和组内相关系数分别为0.82(<0.05)、0.66和0.99。

结论

LHA-CV具有良好的信度和效度,可作为纵向评估精神分裂症患者攻击行为的评估工具。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Life History of Aggression-Chinese Version in Schizophrenia Patients Assessment.《攻击行为生活史中文版在精神分裂症患者评估中的信效度》
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 25;40(4):352-358. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.130602.
2
Brief adult respiratory system health status scale-community version (BARSHSS-CV): developing and evaluating the reliability and validity.简易成人呼吸系统健康状况量表-社区版(BARSHSS-CV):信效度的开发与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3505-z.
3
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Trauma Resiliency Scale (tRS-18).创伤弹性量表(tRS-18)中文版的跨文化调适与验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06166-4.
5
Assessment of life history of aggression: development and psychometric characteristics.攻击性行为生活史评估:发展与心理测量特征
Psychiatry Res. 1997 Dec 5;73(3):147-57. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00119-4.
6
Validity and Reliability of a Simplified Chinese Version of Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs Scale (CaSUN).癌症幸存者未满足需求量表(CaSUN)简体中文版的有效性和可靠性。
Psychooncology. 2024 Oct;33(10):e70008. doi: 10.1002/pon.70008.
7
Reliability and validity evaluation of the appropriate antibiotic use self-efficacy scale for Chinese adults.中文成年人合理使用抗生素自我效能感量表的信度和效度评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13729-1.
8
Development of a Vaccine Advocacy Scale for Childhood Vaccines and Psychometric Evaluation: A Methodological Study.儿童疫苗接种倡导量表的开发与心理测量评估:一项方法学研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):e70056. doi: 10.1111/jep.70056.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Knowledge Scale (BPSD-T): A Psychometric Evaluation Among Caregivers.痴呆行为和心理症状知识量表土耳其语版(BPSD-T)的效度和信度:护理人员的心理测量学评估
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2024;35(4):295-305. doi: 10.5080/u27614.
10
[Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the 5-item oral health impact profile].5项口腔健康影响程度量表中文版的信效度研究
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 1;38(2):145-148. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.02.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the relationships between Early Childhood Adversity, Social Cognition, and Aggression in a South African Study of People Living with Schizophrenia.在一项针对南非精神分裂症患者的研究中探索童年早期逆境、社会认知与攻击行为之间的关系。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Aug 19;42:100382. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100382. eCollection 2025 Dec.