Mahesh Seema, van der Werf Esther, Mallappa Mahesh, Vithoulkas George, Lai Nai Ming
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Centre For Classical Homeopathy, Bengaluru, India.
J Med Life. 2024 Sep;17(9):830-839. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0081.
It is unclear whether fever suppression in the elderly provides long-term benefits or poses risks due to their distinct immune profiles and body temperature regulation compared to younger individuals. This study aimed to assess the long-term health effects of antipyretic treatment during infections in the elderly. A systematic review was conducted, including studies that compared antipyretic treatment with other drugs, therapies, placebo, or no treatment. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. Primary and secondary outcomes were the onset or worsening of chronic inflammatory diseases, fever reduction, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, mortality, laboratory indicators of morbidity, and progression to complications, respectively. Out of 11,481 studies screened, 17 were included (two randomized controlled trials [RCTs], seven observational studies, one case series, and seven case reports). None investigated the primary outcome or patient-reported outcomes. The risk of bias in the included studies ranged from unclear to high. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis was conducted, as meta-analysis was not feasible. Antipyretics showed a significant reduction of fever in RCTs. Five studies reported a significant drop in blood pressure, and one showed significant mortality from antipyretics. Morbidity indicators and length of stay were available only in the studies that reported adverse events. The certainty of evidence, assessed using GRADE, was low to very low for all outcomes. Evidence regarding the long-term benefit or harm from fever suppression with antipyretics during infections in the elderly is insufficient.
与年轻人相比,老年人的免疫特征和体温调节有所不同,因此尚不清楚抑制发热是否能带来长期益处或存在风险。本研究旨在评估老年人感染期间使用退烧药的长期健康影响。进行了一项系统评价,纳入了比较退烧药与其他药物、疗法、安慰剂或不治疗的研究。检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库。主要和次要结局分别是慢性炎症性疾病的发作或恶化、退热、住院时间、患者满意度、死亡率、发病的实验室指标以及并发症进展。在筛选的11481项研究中,纳入了17项(两项随机对照试验、七项观察性研究、一项病例系列和七项病例报告)。没有一项研究调查主要结局或患者报告的结局。纳入研究的偏倚风险从不清楚到高不等。由于研究的异质性,进行了叙述性综合分析,因为荟萃分析不可行。在随机对照试验中,退烧药显示出显著的退热效果。五项研究报告血压显著下降,一项研究显示退烧药导致显著的死亡率。发病率指标和住院时间仅在报告不良事件的研究中可用。使用GRADE评估的证据确定性对于所有结局均为低到非常低。关于老年人感染期间使用退烧药抑制发热的长期益处或危害的证据不足。