• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪效价对视觉选择性注意空间范围的影响。

The impact of emotional valence on the spatial scope of visual selective attention.

作者信息

Chaisilprungraung Thitaporn, Kaewbuapan Poopa, Intrachooto Singh, Pongsuwan Sarigga, Itthipuripat Sirawaj

机构信息

Neuroscience Center for Research and Innovation, Learning Institute, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.

School of Information Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80666-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-80666-x
PMID:39632856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618334/
Abstract

The brain's ability to prioritize behaviorally relevant sensory inputs (i.e., targets) while ignoring irrelevant distractors is crucial for efficient information processing. However, the role of emotional valence in modulating selective attention remains underexplored. This study examined how positive and negative emotions alter the spatial scope of visual selective attention using a modified Eriksen Flanker task. Participants viewed an emotional face cue (happy, angry, or neutral) randomly positioned on the screen and then identified the shape of a subsequent neutral target (bowtie or diamond) at the cued location. Adjacent stimuli either matched the target shape (congruent) or differed (incongruent). Results showed that happy faces increased susceptibility to distractors (i.e., a larger incongruency effect), suggesting a broadening of attentional scope, while angry faces reduced susceptibility (i.e., a smaller incongruency effect), indicating a narrowing of focus. Importantly, the magnitude of this emotion-driven attention modulation was negatively correlated with participants' self-reported levels of psychological distress. Participants with higher stress and depression exhibited weaker attention broadening in response to positive cues. Together, the findings provide behavioral evidence of how emotional valence influences attention scope, offering potential insights into the dynamic interplay between psychological distress, emotional processing, and attention modulation.

摘要

大脑在忽略无关干扰因素的同时,对行为相关的感觉输入(即目标)进行优先级排序的能力,对于高效的信息处理至关重要。然而,情绪效价在调节选择性注意方面的作用仍未得到充分探索。本研究使用改良的埃里克森侧翼任务,考察了积极情绪和消极情绪如何改变视觉选择性注意的空间范围。参与者观看随机置于屏幕上的情绪面孔线索(开心、愤怒或中性),然后在提示位置识别随后出现的中性目标(领结或菱形)的形状。相邻刺激要么与目标形状匹配(一致),要么不同(不一致)。结果显示,开心面孔会增加对干扰因素的易感性(即更大的不一致效应),表明注意范围扩大;而愤怒面孔则会降低易感性(即较小的不一致效应),表明注意力焦点缩小。重要的是,这种由情绪驱动的注意调节幅度与参与者自我报告的心理困扰水平呈负相关。压力和抑郁程度较高的参与者对积极线索的注意范围扩大反应较弱。总之,这些发现为情绪效价如何影响注意范围提供了行为证据,为心理困扰、情绪处理和注意调节之间的动态相互作用提供了潜在见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e8/11618334/59933ef92ad0/41598_2024_80666_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e8/11618334/3f965d1e49d0/41598_2024_80666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e8/11618334/2bae74faae4e/41598_2024_80666_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e8/11618334/59933ef92ad0/41598_2024_80666_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e8/11618334/3f965d1e49d0/41598_2024_80666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e8/11618334/2bae74faae4e/41598_2024_80666_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e8/11618334/59933ef92ad0/41598_2024_80666_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of emotional valence on the spatial scope of visual selective attention.情绪效价对视觉选择性注意空间范围的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80666-x.
2
Event-Related Potentials Reveal Evidence for Late Integration of Emotional Prosody and Facial Expression in Dynamic Stimuli: An ERP Study.事件相关电位揭示动态刺激中情绪韵律和面部表情晚期整合的证据:一项ERP研究
Multisens Res. 2019 Jan 1;32(6):473-497. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20191332.
3
Efficient visual search for facial emotions in patients with major depression.高效地对重性抑郁障碍患者的面部情绪进行视觉搜索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03093-6.
4
Electrophysiological evidence of attentional biases in social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍中注意偏向的电生理证据。
Psychol Med. 2009 Jul;39(7):1141-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004820. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
5
Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.早期视觉皮层中对情感面孔和复杂国际情感图片系统(IAPS)图像的注意偏向遵循情绪线索提取。
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:254-266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.052. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Angry faces hold attention: Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms.愤怒的面孔吸引注意力:两种范式下注意力黏附的证据。
Prog Brain Res. 2019;247:89-110. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.033. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
7
Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces.无关愤怒面部表情对注意力捕获的电生理证据:自然面孔
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jan 10;637:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.055. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
8
Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?在人群中注视面部任务:为什么愤怒的面孔被更快发现?
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e93914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093914. eCollection 2014.
9
Attentional Bias towards Positive Emotion Predicts Stress Resilience.对积极情绪的注意偏向预测压力恢复力。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0148368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148368. eCollection 2016.
10
Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion.情绪线索有效性效应:神经认知对情绪反应的作用。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 6;12(7):e0179714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179714. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of depression, anxiety, and stress scales (DASS-21) among Thai nursing students in an online learning environment during the COVID-19 outbreak: A multi-center study.在 COVID-19 疫情期间,在在线学习环境中对泰国护理专业学生的抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)进行验证:一项多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 30;18(6):e0288041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288041. eCollection 2023.
2
A Normalization Framework for Emotional Attention.一种情感注意力的归一化框架。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov 21;14(11):e1002578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002578. eCollection 2016 Nov.
3
Social anxiety and narrowed attentional breadth toward faces.
社交焦虑与对面孔的注意力狭窄
Emotion. 2015 Dec;15(6):682-6. doi: 10.1037/emo0000070. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
4
Changing the spatial scope of attention alters patterns of neural gain in human cortex.改变注意力的空间范围会改变人类大脑皮层的神经增益模式。
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):112-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3943-13.2014.
5
Using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) across cultures.跨文化使用抑郁焦虑压力量表 21 版(DASS-21)。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(6):1018-29. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.755535. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
Attentional impairment in anxiety: inefficiency in expanding the scope of attention.焦虑中的注意力损伤:注意范围扩展的效率低下。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Mar;29(3):243-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20900. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
7
Components of attentional biases in contamination fear: evidence for difficulty in disengagement.注意偏向在污染恐惧中的成分:难以转移的证据。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Jan;48(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
8
The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.NimStim面部表情集:来自未经训练的研究参与者的判断
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006. Epub 2009 Jun 28.
9
Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding.情感状态效价对视觉皮层编码的相反影响。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 3;29(22):7199-207. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5387-08.2009.
10
How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?情感和动机如何指导执行控制?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Mar 13.