Zhang Xiangqun, Yang Long, Wu Junyuan, Mei Xue
Emergency Medicine Clinical Research Center, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Clinical Center for Medicine in Acute Infection. Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Nov 30;17:5335-5346. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S497311. eCollection 2024.
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant global health issue, leading to high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the existence of various severity scoring systems, accurately predicting patient outcomes remains challenging. The CAP-PIRO (Predisposition, Insult, Response, and Organ dysfunction) scoring system offers a comprehensive approach to evaluating CAP severity and prognosis.
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the CAP-PIRO scoring system in predicting the prognosis and severity of CAP patients, focusing on the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and 28-day mortality.
A total of 875 CAP patients were prospectively enrolled from the emergency department of Beijing Chao-yang Hospital between November 2017 and December 2023. Clinical data, including patient demographics, medical history, vital signs, and laboratory findings, were collected within 6 hours of admission. CAP-PIRO, CURB-65, and PSI scores were calculated. Patients were stratified based on ARDS development, 28-day mortality, and PaO2/FiO2 categories (≤100 mmHg, 100-200 mmHg, 200-300 mmHg).
Significant differences were observed in PCT, blood lactate (Lac), CURB-65, PSI, and CAP-PIRO scores between patients with and without ARDS, as well as between survivors and non-survivors at 28 days (P<0.05). CAP-PIRO and Lac were identified as independent predictors for ARDS development and 28-day mortality. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CAP-PIRO was higher than that for CURB-65 and PSI in predicting 28-day mortality. The combination of CAP-PIRO and Lac demonstrated improved predictive accuracy for ARDS. Notably, significant differences in CAP-PIRO scores were observed across different PaO2/FiO2 groups.
CAP-PIRO demonstrates strong predictive ability for adverse outcomes and, when combined with lactate, shows enhanced predictive power. These findings underscore the value of CAP-PIRO for clinical risk stratification in CAP patients.
社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是一个重大的全球健康问题,导致高发病率和死亡率。尽管存在各种严重程度评分系统,但准确预测患者预后仍然具有挑战性。CAP-PIRO(易感性、损伤、反应和器官功能障碍)评分系统为评估CAP的严重程度和预后提供了一种全面的方法。
本研究旨在评估CAP-PIRO评分系统在预测CAP患者预后和严重程度方面的有效性,重点关注急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的发生和28天死亡率。
2017年11月至2023年12月期间,在北京朝阳医院急诊科前瞻性纳入了875例CAP患者。在入院6小时内收集临床数据,包括患者人口统计学、病史、生命体征和实验室检查结果。计算CAP-PIRO、CURB-65和PSI评分。根据ARDS发生情况、28天死亡率和PaO2/FiO2类别(≤100mmHg、100-200mmHg、200-300mmHg)对患者进行分层。
在有无ARDS的患者之间以及28天时的存活者和非存活者之间,观察到降钙素原(PCT)、血乳酸(Lac)、CURB-65、PSI和CAP-PIRO评分存在显著差异(P<0.05)。CAP-PIRO和Lac被确定为ARDS发生和28天死亡率的独立预测因素。在预测28天死亡率方面,CAP-PIRO的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)高于CURB-65和PSI。CAP-PIRO和Lac的组合对ARDS的预测准确性有所提高。值得注意的是,在不同的PaO2/FiO2组中观察到CAP-PIRO评分存在显著差异。
CAP-PIRO对不良结局具有很强的预测能力,与乳酸联合使用时,预测能力增强。这些发现强调了CAP-PIRO在CAP患者临床风险分层中的价值。