Suppr超能文献

在严峻环境中使用即时超声:一项范围综述。

Point-of-care ultrasound use in austere environments: A scoping review.

作者信息

Anderson Aubree, Theophanous Rebecca G

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Durham Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Durham, NC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0312017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312017. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Technological developments in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), particularly with portable devices, are transforming POCUS use in austere, resource-limited environments (RLS) distinct from typical hospital or medical settings. POCUS has potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in military combat zones, low-resource environments such as the desert or tropics, microgravity, and high altitudes. Our updated narrative scoping review describes POCUS use in these global settings.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, two ultrasound-trained emergency physicians searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on August 6, 2024 for "point-of-care ultrasound in austere environments" and each individual category. Study titles and abstracts were independently screened, then full manuscripts, and data was abstracted with a data collection table. 324 articles met inclusion criteria: research studies describing POCUS in austere environments; involving healthcare professionals; and in English. We excluded abstracts, studies not involving POCUS in austere environments, and non-clinical studies. Reviewers critically appraised studies using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) Quality Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

There were 39 military or conflict zone studies, 101 prehospital, 148 in RLS including low- and middle-income countries, 12 outer space, 15 high altitude, and 32 involving POCUS use in multiple austere environments. There were 6 randomized-control trials, 11 systematic/scoping reviews, 13 narrative reviews, 112 prospective observational/cohort, 34 prospective cross-sectional studies, 23 retrospective, 6 feasibility, 45 case reports, 13 case series, and 5 educational curriculum studies. GRADE study quality was variable, with 74 high quality, 129 moderate, 82 low, and 56 very low.

CONCLUSION

The existing literature is mixed with variability in study settings, design, and POCUS examination types, providing an initial understanding of POCUS applications. Most studies are in RLS or prehospital settings. Additional high-quality studies are needed to guide POCUS training, disseminate use in non-hospital settings, and maximize impact for improved clinical outcomes in diverse austere environments.

摘要

背景/目的:即时超声检查(POCUS)技术的发展,尤其是便携式设备的发展,正在改变POCUS在与典型医院或医疗环境不同的严峻、资源有限环境(RLS)中的应用。POCUS有潜力提高军事作战区域、沙漠或热带等资源匮乏环境、微重力环境和高海拔地区的诊断准确性。我们更新的叙述性范围综述描述了POCUS在这些全球环境中的应用。

方法

按照PRISMA-ScR指南,两名接受过超声培训的急诊医生于2024年8月6日在PubMed、Embase和科学网中搜索“严峻环境中的即时超声检查”以及各个单独类别。研究标题和摘要由两人独立筛选,然后是全文,数据通过数据收集表进行提取。324篇文章符合纳入标准:描述严峻环境中POCUS的研究;涉及医疗保健专业人员;且为英文。我们排除了摘要、不涉及严峻环境中POCUS的研究以及非临床研究。评审人员使用GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)质量评估工具对研究进行严格评估。

结果

有39项军事或冲突地区研究、101项院前研究、148项RLS研究(包括低收入和中等收入国家)、12项外层空间研究、15项高海拔研究以及32项涉及在多种严峻环境中使用POCUS的研究。有6项随机对照试验、11项系统/范围综述、13项叙述性综述、112项前瞻性观察/队列研究、34项前瞻性横断面研究、23项回顾性研究、6项可行性研究、45项病例报告、13项病例系列研究以及5项教育课程研究。GRADE研究质量参差不齐,74项高质量、129项中等质量、82项低质量以及56项极低质量。

结论

现有文献在研究环境、设计和POCUS检查类型方面存在差异,为POCUS的应用提供了初步认识。大多数研究是在RLS或院前环境中进行的。需要更多高质量研究来指导POCUS培训,在非医院环境中推广其使用,并最大限度地提高其对改善不同严峻环境中临床结果的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46de/11620461/8ded12b101e6/pone.0312017.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验