• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据审查、利益相关者参与和实践评估,制定一个理解诊断核对的框架。

Developing a framework for understanding diagnostic reconciliation based on evidence review, stakeholder engagement, and practice evaluation.

作者信息

Algarin Perneth Sandra, Perez Rodriguez Garcia Gilberto, Brito Juan P, Gandhi Tejal, Bylund Carma L, Hargraves Ian G, Singh Ospina Naykky

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Dec 10;12(1):45-52. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0132. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1515/dx-2024-0132
PMID:39648180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11839145/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic reconciliation is the collaborative process between patients and clinicians to create and reconcile evidence-based, feasible, and desirable care plans. However, the specific components of this process remain unclear. The objective of this study was to develop the first comprehensive framework to elucidate the diagnostic reconciliation process.

METHODS

We followed a multi-step and iterative approach to develop the framework, including a focused systematic review of diagnostic conversations, quantitative evaluation of recordings of real-life clinical visits recordings, and stakeholder engagement (e.g., patients, clinicians, researchers).

RESULTS

We identified 17 potential components to the process of diagnostic reconciliation through literature review and stakeholder engagement. After review of 56 clinical visits and further stakeholder engagement, we developed a final framework including four categories: 1) understanding the need for a test/referral, 2) logistics of test/referral scheduling, 3) test/referral information, and 4) test/referral results.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed framework lays the foundation for evaluation and improvement of diagnostic conversations in practice. Clinicians can enhance patient-centered diagnosis by co-creating diagnostic plans of care in practice and using the components described in the novel diagnostic reconciliation framework.

摘要

目的

诊断协调是患者与临床医生之间的协作过程,旨在制定并协调基于证据、可行且理想的护理计划。然而,这一过程的具体组成部分仍不明确。本研究的目的是开发首个全面框架以阐明诊断协调过程。

方法

我们采用多步骤迭代方法来开发该框架,包括对诊断对话进行重点系统综述、对实际临床诊疗记录进行定量评估以及让利益相关者(如患者、临床医生、研究人员)参与其中。

结果

通过文献综述和利益相关者参与,我们确定了诊断协调过程的17个潜在组成部分。在对56次临床诊疗进行审查并进一步让利益相关者参与后,我们制定了一个最终框架,包括四个类别:1)理解检查/转诊需求,2)检查/转诊安排的后勤事宜,3)检查/转诊信息,4)检查/转诊结果。

结论

所提出的框架为在实践中评估和改进诊断对话奠定了基础。临床医生可通过在实践中共同制定诊断护理计划并使用新的诊断协调框架中描述的组成部分,来加强以患者为中心的诊断。

相似文献

1
Developing a framework for understanding diagnostic reconciliation based on evidence review, stakeholder engagement, and practice evaluation.基于证据审查、利益相关者参与和实践评估,制定一个理解诊断核对的框架。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Dec 10;12(1):45-52. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0132. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.
2
3
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
5
Strategies to foster stakeholder engagement in residency coaching: a CFIR-Informed qualitative study across diverse stakeholder groups.促进利益相关者参与住院医师辅导的策略:基于 CFIR 的跨不同利益相关者群体的定性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2407656. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2407656. Epub 2024 Sep 22.
6
Lessons for the UK on implementation and evaluation of breastfeeding support: evidence syntheses and stakeholder engagement.英国在实施和评估母乳喂养支持方面的经验教训:证据综合和利益相关者参与。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(20):1-206. doi: 10.3310/DGTP5702.
7
Introducing pulse oximetry in routine IMCI services in Bangladesh: A context-driven approach to influence policy and programme through stakeholder engagement.在孟加拉国的常规综合管理儿童疾病服务中引入脉搏血氧饱和度测定法:一种通过利益相关者参与来影响政策和项目的情境驱动方法。
J Glob Health. 2022 Apr 9;12:06001. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.06001. eCollection 2022.
8
Co-Designing an Initiative to Increase Shared Access to Older Adults' Patient Portals: Stakeholder Engagement.共同设计一项提高老年人患者门户共享访问的计划:利益相关者的参与。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 22;25:e46146. doi: 10.2196/46146.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Stroke patient and stakeholder engagement (SPSE): concepts, definitions, models, implementation strategies, indicators, and frameworks-a systematic scoping review.卒中患者和利益相关者参与(SPSE):概念、定义、模型、实施策略、指标和框架——系统范围界定综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;13(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02686-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding diagnostic conversations in clinical practice: A systematic review.理解临床实践中的诊断对话:系统综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Nov;116:107949. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107949. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
2
Collaborative Diagnostic Conversations Between Clinicians, Patients, and Their Families: A Way to Avoid Diagnostic Errors.临床医生、患者及其家属之间的协作诊断对话:一种避免诊断错误的方法。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Jul 7;7(4):291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes.通过对在线就诊记录进行结构化评估,邀请患者识别诊断问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1091-1100. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac036.
4
Ultrasound Guided Thyroid Biopsy.超声引导下甲状腺细针穿刺活检。
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Sep;24(3):100768. doi: 10.1016/j.tvir.2021.100768. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
5
Diagnostic Excellence Through the Lens of Patient-Centeredness.以患者为中心视角下的卓越诊断。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2127-2128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19513.
6
Patient Responses to Diagnosis in Surgeon-Patient Consultations.患者在医患交流中对诊断的反应。
Health Commun. 2023 Mar;38(3):608-617. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1965278. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal breast cancer screening mammograms in primary care: a systematic review.在初级保健中延迟或未能随访异常乳腺癌筛查乳房 X 光片:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08100-3.
8
Use of patient complaints to identify diagnosis-related safety concerns: a mixed-method evaluation.利用患者投诉识别与诊断相关的安全问题:混合方法评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Dec;30(12):996-1001. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011593. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
Measuring and Improving Diagnostic Safety in Primary Care: Addressing the "Twin" Pandemics of Diagnostic Error and Clinician Burnout.测量和提高初级保健中的诊断安全性:应对诊断错误和临床医生倦怠的“双重”流行。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1404-1406. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06611-0. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
10
Influence of doctor-patient conversations on behaviours of patients presenting to primary care with new or persistent symptoms: a video observation study.医患对话对初诊有新发或持续症状患者行为的影响:一项视频观察研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Mar;29(3):198-208. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009485. Epub 2019 Jul 20.