• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度至重度干旱胁迫下藜麦和玉米的PSII光化学比较

Comparative PSII photochemistry of quinoa and maize under mild to severe drought stress.

作者信息

Malan C, Berner J M

机构信息

North-West University, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

出版信息

Photosynthetica. 2022 May 27;60(3):362-371. doi: 10.32615/ps.2022.022. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.32615/ps.2022.022
PMID:39650103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11558597/
Abstract

Quinoa has been identified as a climate-resilient crop that can overcome unfavorable conditions. This study explores the photochemical efficiency of quinoa compared to maize subjected to drought stress. The JIP-test was used to assess the photochemical efficiency of both crops. Proline content, leaf water potential, and membrane leakage were also determined. The maximum photochemical efficiency (F/F) did not change for quinoa and maize under moderate stress. However, severe drought conditions resulted in a decline in F/F in maize but not quinoa. Furthermore, the PSII performance index (PI) declined steadily in maize soon after the onset of drought stress. The decline in the PI values for quinoa was only observed after a period of severe drought stress. Membrane leakage was also more prevalent in the maize plants, while quinoa had higher proline contents. This study concluded that both quinoa and maize maintained PSII structure and function under moderate drought conditions. However, only quinoa maintained PSII structure and function under severe drought conditions.

摘要

藜麦已被认定为一种能够抵御不利条件的抗气候作物。本研究探讨了与遭受干旱胁迫的玉米相比,藜麦的光化学效率。采用JIP测试来评估两种作物的光化学效率。还测定了脯氨酸含量、叶片水势和膜透性。在中度胁迫下,藜麦和玉米的最大光化学效率(F/F)没有变化。然而,严重干旱条件导致玉米的F/F下降,但藜麦没有。此外,干旱胁迫开始后不久,玉米的PSII性能指数(PI)稳步下降。藜麦的PI值仅在经历一段严重干旱胁迫后才出现下降。膜透性在玉米植株中也更为普遍,而藜麦的脯氨酸含量更高。本研究得出结论,在中度干旱条件下,藜麦和玉米均能维持PSII的结构和功能。然而,只有藜麦在严重干旱条件下能维持PSII的结构和功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/829764012697/PS-60-3-60362-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/5d4156900608/PS-60-3-60362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/775fb7047027/PS-60-3-60362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/73ac57bde059/PS-60-3-60362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/4bfdf3aadc7c/PS-60-3-60362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/452051c9059f/PS-60-3-60362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/829764012697/PS-60-3-60362-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/5d4156900608/PS-60-3-60362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/775fb7047027/PS-60-3-60362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/73ac57bde059/PS-60-3-60362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/4bfdf3aadc7c/PS-60-3-60362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/452051c9059f/PS-60-3-60362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39b6/11558597/829764012697/PS-60-3-60362-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative PSII photochemistry of quinoa and maize under mild to severe drought stress.轻度至重度干旱胁迫下藜麦和玉米的PSII光化学比较
Photosynthetica. 2022 May 27;60(3):362-371. doi: 10.32615/ps.2022.022. eCollection 2022.
2
Photosynthetic performance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) after exposure to a gradual drought stress followed by a recovery period.藜(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)在经历逐渐干旱胁迫及随后的恢复期后的光合性能。
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2021 May 1;1862(5):148383. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2021.148383. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
Nitrogen Supply Affects Photosynthesis and Photoprotective Attributes During Drought-Induced Senescence in Quinoa.氮素供应影响藜麦干旱诱导衰老过程中的光合作用和光保护特性。
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 30;9:994. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00994. eCollection 2018.
4
Sensitivity of the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Maize and Sorghum under Different Drought Levels.不同干旱水平下玉米和高粱光合器官的敏感性
Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 30;12(9):1863. doi: 10.3390/plants12091863.
5
Is Photoprotection of PSII One of the Key Mechanisms for Drought Tolerance in Maize?PSII 的光保护是否是玉米耐旱的关键机制之一?
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 16;22(24):13490. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413490.
6
Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa ( Willd.) Cultivars.灌浆期水分胁迫对Illpa和彩虹藜麦(威尔德)品种产量、品质及生理特性的影响
Plants (Basel). 2019 Jun 14;8(6):173. doi: 10.3390/plants8060173.
7
Nitrogen increases drought tolerance in maize seedlings.氮能提高玉米幼苗的耐旱性。
Funct Plant Biol. 2019 Mar;46(4):350-359. doi: 10.1071/FP18186.
8
Drought Tolerance Assessment of Okra ( [L.] Moench) Accessions Based on Leaf Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence.基于叶片气体交换和叶绿素荧光的秋葵([L.] Moench)种质资源耐旱性评估
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 2;13(3):682. doi: 10.3390/life13030682.
9
Photosynthesis, photochemistry and antioxidative defence in response to two drought severities and with re-watering in Allocasuarina luehmannii.对两种干旱程度及复水后木麻黄光合作用、光化学和抗氧化防御的响应。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2009 Nov;11 Suppl 1:83-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00245.x.
10
Drought Has a Greater Negative Effect on the Growth of the C Crop Halophyte than Elevated CO and/or High Temperature.干旱对C作物盐生植物生长的负面影响大于二氧化碳浓度升高和/或高温。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jun 16;13(12):1666. doi: 10.3390/plants13121666.

引用本文的文献

1
Pipecolic Acid, a Drought Stress Modulator, Boosts Chlorophyll Assimilation, Photosynthetic Performance, Redox Homeostasis, and Osmotic Adjustment of Drought-Affected L. Seedlings.哌可酸,一种干旱胁迫调节剂,可促进干旱影响的番茄幼苗的叶绿素同化、光合性能、氧化还原稳态和渗透调节。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;14(13):1949. doi: 10.3390/plants14131949.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulation of the generation of reactive oxygen species during photosynthetic electron transport.光合电子传递过程中活性氧生成的调控。
Biochem Soc Trans. 2022 Apr 29;50(2):1025-1034. doi: 10.1042/BST20211246.
2
Linking changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence with drought stress susceptibility in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek].将叶绿素荧光变化与绿豆(Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)抗旱性的敏感性联系起来。
Physiol Plant. 2021 Jun;172(2):1244-1254. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13327. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
The oxygen-evolving complex: a super catalyst for life on earth, in response to abiotic stresses.
放氧复合物:对地球生命而言的超级催化剂,应对非生物胁迫。
Plant Signal Behav. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):1824721. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1824721. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
The polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence rise measured under high intensity of exciting light.在高强度激发光下测量的多相叶绿素a荧光上升。
Funct Plant Biol. 2006 Feb;33(1):9-30. doi: 10.1071/FP05095.
5
Proline metabolic dynamics and implications in drought tolerance of peanut plants.脯氨酸代谢动态及其在花生耐旱性中的意义。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Jun;151:566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
Regulation of L-proline biosynthesis, signal transduction, transport, accumulation and its vital role in plants during variable environmental conditions.L-脯氨酸生物合成、信号转导、运输、积累的调控及其在植物应对多变环境条件时的重要作用。
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 9;5(12):e02952. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02952. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Source-Sink Regulation in Crops under Water Deficit.作物水分亏缺下的源库调控。
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Jul;24(7):652-663. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Photoinhibition and Abiotic Stress: Does it Make Any Difference the Fact to Be a C3 or C4 Species?叶绿素荧光、光抑制与非生物胁迫:作为C3或C4植物有区别吗?
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 14;10:174. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00174. eCollection 2019.
9
Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves.干旱胁迫对苹果幼树叶片光合作用及光合电子传递链的影响
Biol Open. 2018 Nov 22;7(11):bio035279. doi: 10.1242/bio.035279.
10
Reactive oxygen species signaling and stomatal movement in plant responses to drought stress and pathogen attack.活性氧信号转导与气孔运动在植物应对干旱胁迫和病原体攻击中的作用。
J Integr Plant Biol. 2018 Sep;60(9):805-826. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12654. Epub 2018 Jul 3.