Molfenter Todd, Ducharme Lori, Stein Lynda, Belenko Steven, Mitchell Shannon Gwin, Watson Dennis P, Aalsma Matthew C, Friedmann Peter D, Becan Jennifer E, Garner Bryan R, Vechinski Jessica, Bouris Alida, Claypool Emily, Elkington Kate
Center for Health Enhancement System Studies (CHESS), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Services Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Implement Res Pract. 2024 Dec 5;5:26334895241297278. doi: 10.1177/26334895241297278. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
The outcomes of planned implementation efforts have been mixed, with some applications failing to achieve the desired change or impact. While reasons for mixed findings in implementation research are multifaceted (e.g., Damschroder et al., 2009, 2022), how the implementation strategy (IS) was deployed (i.e., integrity) and its impact on the implementation outcomes of evidence-based innovations (EBIs) is under-studied and warrants further clarification.
This article builds on the IS fidelity and mechanisms of change literature to create the Implementation Strategy Integrity Framework (ISIF). The ISIF was developed by a set of implementation science researchers in the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network seeking to document the role of implementation strategies in influencing EBI outcomes.
The authors identified four areas of documentation and measurement to examine the role of IS integrity on EBI outcomes. (a) Implementation Strategy Rigor (i.e., adherence, dose, and quality) requires those implementing the strategy/strategies to specify them, document adherence to the planned strategies, quality of execution, and any adaptations made. (b) Target User Responsiveness documents the extent and quality of targeted users' participation in IS activities and how well the target users perform their roles in conducting actions intended by the implementation strategies. (c) Target Mechanism Activation notes to what degree the implementation strategies achieved the intended impact(s) on targeted factors that facilitate EBI use. Finally, (d) these three areas are combined with selected Inner and Outer Context variables to explain IS integrity's potential moderating and mediating effects on EBI outcomes.
A framework that can define the integrity of an IS and allow for its subsequent use as an explanatory variable in EBI outcomes is necessary for better elucidating mechanisms of action. The ISIF offers a structured approach to operationalize, measure, and evaluate the application and related impacts of implementation strategies.
计划实施工作的结果参差不齐,一些应用未能实现预期的变化或影响。虽然实施研究结果不一的原因是多方面的(例如,丹姆施罗德等人,2009年、2022年),但实施策略(IS)的部署方式(即完整性)及其对循证创新(EBI)实施结果的影响研究不足,需要进一步阐明。
本文以IS保真度和变革机制文献为基础,创建了实施策略完整性框架(ISIF)。ISIF由司法社区阿片类药物创新网络中的一组实施科学研究人员开发,旨在记录实施策略在影响EBI结果方面的作用。
作者确定了四个记录和测量领域,以检验IS完整性对EBI结果的作用。(a) 实施策略严谨性(即依从性、剂量和质量)要求实施一项或多项策略的人员明确这些策略,记录对计划策略的依从情况、执行质量以及所做的任何调整。(b) 目标用户响应性记录目标用户参与IS活动的程度和质量,以及目标用户在执行实施策略预期行动方面的表现。(c) 目标机制激活记录实施策略在多大程度上对促进EBI使用的目标因素产生了预期影响。最后,(d)将这三个领域与选定的内部和外部背景变量相结合,以解释IS完整性对EBI结果的潜在调节和中介作用。
一个能够定义IS完整性并允许其随后用作EBI结果解释变量的框架,对于更好地阐明作用机制是必要的。ISIF提供了一种结构化方法,用于实施、测量和评估实施策略的应用及相关影响。