Zhao Cong, Pu Meng, Wu Chengji, Ding Jiaqi, Guo Jun, Zhang Guangyun
Department of Neurology, Air Force Medical Center of PLA, Beijing, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Air Force Medical Center of PLA, Beijing, China.
Front Nutr. 2024 Nov 22;11:1471981. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1471981. eCollection 2024.
Cognitive function impairment (CFI) and the Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index (CDAI) were investigated in this study.
Participants from the 2011-2014 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were chosen to assess cognitive function using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Word Learning Test, the Animal Fluency Test, and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Participants scored below the 25% percentile of any of the three tests were defined as having cognitive function impairment. 24-h recalls of diet were collected to calculate CDAI.
2,424 participants were included. The fully adjusted multivariate logistic regression model showed an increase of one CDAI unit reduced CFI risk by 5% (95% CI: 0.92 ~ 0.98, = 0.004). When comparing individuals with the lowest CDAI in the first quartile (<-2.42), the adjusted odds ratio for CDAI and CFI were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.61 ~ 1.06, = 0.125) in the second quartile, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.51 ~ 0.92, = 0.012) in the third quartile, and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.43 ~ 0.82, = 0.002) in the fourth quartile, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a steady negative linear correlation between CDAI and CFI, with a -value for non-linearity of 0.122. Subgroup analysis did not reveal any significant interactions based on age, education level, family income, history of diabetes, hypertension, stroke, and depression.
CDAI was inversely associated with CFI in a large representative American population. Further longitudinal studies are needed for causal inference.
本研究对认知功能障碍(CFI)和复合膳食抗氧化指数(CDAI)进行了调查。
选取2011 - 2014年国家健康与营养检查调查周期的参与者,使用阿尔茨海默病注册协会词汇学习测试、动物流畅性测试和数字符号替换测试来评估认知功能。在三项测试中得分低于第25百分位数的参与者被定义为患有认知功能障碍。收集24小时饮食回忆以计算CDAI。
纳入了2424名参与者。完全调整后的多变量逻辑回归模型显示,CDAI每增加一个单位,CFI风险降低5%(95%置信区间:0.92 ~ 0.98,P = 0.004)。与第一四分位数中CDAI最低的个体(<-2.42)相比,第二四分位数中CDAI与CFI的调整优势比为0.81(95%置信区间:0.61 ~ 1.06,P = 0.125),第三四分位数中为0.69(95%置信区间:0.51 ~ 0.92,P = 0.012),第四四分位数中为0.59(95%置信区间:0.43 ~ 0.82,P = 0.002)。受限立方样条分析显示CDAI与CFI之间存在稳定的负线性相关,非线性P值为0.122。亚组分析未发现基于年龄、教育水平、家庭收入、糖尿病史、高血压史、中风史和抑郁症史的任何显著交互作用。
在具有广泛代表性的美国人群中,CDAI与CFI呈负相关。需要进一步进行纵向研究以进行因果推断。