Sharghi Sima, Khalatbari Shokoufeh, Laird Amy, Lapidus Jodi, Enders Felicity T, Meinzen-Derr Jareen, Tapia Amanda L, Ciolino Jody D
Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
The Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 29;8(1):e182. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.632. eCollection 2024.
Research studies involving human subjects require collection of and reporting on demographic data related to race and ethnicity. However, existing practices lack standardized guidelines, leading to misrepresentation and biased inferences and conclusions for underrepresented populations in research studies. For instance, sometimes there is a misconception that self-reported racial or ethnic identity may be treated as a biological variable with underlying genetic implications, overlooking its role as a social construct reflecting lived experiences of specific populations. In this manuscript, we use the We All Count data equity framework, which organizes data projects across seven stages: Funding, Motivation, Project Design, Data Collection, Analysis, Reporting, and Communication. Focusing on data collection and analysis, we use examples - both real and hypothetical - to review common practice and provide critiques and alternative recommendations. Through these examples and recommendations, we hope to provide the reader with some ideas and a starting point as they consider embedding a lens of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusivity from research conception to dissemination of findings.
涉及人类受试者的研究需要收集并报告与种族和族裔相关的人口统计数据。然而,现有的做法缺乏标准化指南,导致在研究中对代表性不足的人群进行错误表述以及得出有偏差的推论和结论。例如,有时存在一种误解,即自我报告的种族或族裔身份可能被视为具有潜在遗传影响的生物学变量,而忽略了其作为反映特定人群生活经历的社会建构的作用。在本手稿中,我们使用“我们都重要”数据公平框架,该框架将数据项目组织为七个阶段:资金、动机、项目设计、数据收集、分析、报告和传播。聚焦于数据收集和分析,我们使用实际和假设的例子来审视常见做法,并提供批评意见和替代建议。通过这些例子和建议,我们希望在读者从研究构思到研究结果传播的过程中考虑融入正义、公平、多样性和包容性视角时,为他们提供一些思路和起点。