Cohen Phillip D, Boss Renee D, Stockwell David C, Bernier Meghan, Collaco Joseph M, Kudchadkar Sapna R
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec 9;13(4):97145. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i4.97145.
There is a substantial population of long-stay patients who non-emergently transfer directly from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without an interim discharge home. These infants are often medically complex and have higher mortality relative to NICU or PICU-only admissions. Given an absence of data surrounding practice patterns for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers, we hypothesized that we would encounter a broad spectrum of current practices and a high proportion of dissatisfaction with current processes.
To characterize non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices across the United States and query PICU providers' evaluations of their effectiveness.
A cross-sectional survey was drafted, piloted, and sent to one physician representative from each of 115 PICUs across the United States based on membership in the PARK-PICU research consortium and membership in the Children's Hospital Association. The survey was administered internet (REDCap). Analysis was performed using STATA, primarily consisting of descriptive statistics, though logistic regressions were run examining the relationship between specific transfer steps, hospital characteristics, and effectiveness of transfer.
One PICU attending from each of 81 institutions in the United States completed the survey (overall 70% response rate). Over half (52%) indicated their hospital transfers patients without using set clinical criteria, and only 33% indicated that their hospital has a standardized protocol to facilitate non-emergent transfer. Fewer than half of respondents reported that their institution's non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices were effective for clinicians (47%) or patient families (38%). Respondents evaluated their centers' transfers as less effective when they lacked any transfer criteria ( = 0.027) or set transfer protocols ( = 0.007). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that having set clinical criteria and standardized protocols for non-emergent transfer were important to the patient-family experience and patient safety.
Most hospitals lacked any clinical criteria or protocols for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers. More positive perceptions of transfer effectiveness were found among those with set criteria and/or transfer protocols.
有相当一部分长期住院患者在未临时出院回家的情况下,直接从新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)非紧急转至儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。这些婴儿病情通常较为复杂,与仅入住NICU或PICU的患者相比,死亡率更高。鉴于缺乏关于NICU至PICU非紧急转运实践模式的数据,我们推测会遇到各种各样的当前实践情况,并且对当前流程的不满比例较高。
描述美国各地NICU至PICU的非紧急转运实践情况,并询问PICU医护人员对其有效性的评估。
根据参与PARK - PICU研究联盟和儿童医院协会的成员情况,起草、试行并向美国115个PICU中的每个单位的一名医生代表发送了一份横断面调查问卷。该调查通过互联网(REDCap)进行管理。使用STATA进行分析,主要包括描述性统计,不过也进行了逻辑回归分析,以研究特定转运步骤、医院特征与转运有效性之间的关系。
美国81家机构的各一名PICU主治医生完成了调查(总体回复率为70%)。超过一半(52%)表示他们的医院在转运患者时未使用既定的临床标准,只有33%表示他们的医院有标准化方案来促进非紧急转运。不到一半的受访者表示他们机构的NICU至PICU非紧急转运实践对临床医生(47%)或患者家属(38%)有效。当缺乏任何转运标准(P = 0.027)或既定转运方案(P = 0.007)时,受访者对其中心转运的评估效果较差。绝大多数受访者一致认为,为非紧急转运制定既定的临床标准和标准化方案对患者家属体验和患者安全很重要。
大多数医院缺乏NICU至PICU非紧急转运的任何临床标准或方案。在有既定标准和/或转运方案的医院中,对转运有效性的看法更为积极。