Pattison Natalie A, O'Gara Geraldine, Cuthbertson Brian H, Rose Louise
School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Dec 8;26(1):53-60. doi: 10.1177/17511437241301921. eCollection 2025 Feb.
The COVID-19 pandemic challenged both research and clinical teams in critical care to collaborate on research solutions to new clinical problems. Although an effective, nationally coordinated response helped facilitate critical care research, reprioritisation of research efforts towards COVID-19 studies had significant consequences for existing and planned research activity in critical care.
Our aim was to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic research prioritisation policies and practices on critical care research funded prior to the pandemic, the conduct of pandemic research, and implications for ongoing and future critical care research.
We undertook a descriptive qualitative study recruiting research-active clinician researchers and research delivery team members working in critical care. We conducted digitally recorded, semi-structured interviews in 2021-2022. Framework Analysis was used to analyse the data.
We interviewed 22 participants comprising principal investigators, senior trial coordinators and research delivery nurses from across the UK. Six themes were identified: These themes explained how a nationally coordinated response during the pandemic affected individuals, studies and wider organisations in managing the research response in critical care, highlighting future implications for critical care research.
Harnessing the collective response seen in the COVID-19 pandemic in critical care could better support integration of research activity into routine critical care activities. Future endeavours should focus on workforce preparations, contingency planning, strategies for study prioritisation and integration of research as part of the continuum of clinical care.
新冠疫情给重症监护领域的研究和临床团队带来挑战,促使他们就新临床问题的研究解决方案展开合作。尽管全国范围内的有效协调应对有助于推动重症监护研究,但将研究工作重新优先安排到新冠研究上,对重症监护领域现有的和计划中的研究活动产生了重大影响。
我们的目的是探讨新冠疫情研究优先排序政策和做法对疫情之前资助的重症监护研究、疫情研究的开展以及对正在进行的和未来的重症监护研究的影响。
我们开展了一项描述性定性研究,招募了从事重症监护工作的积极参与研究的临床研究人员和研究执行团队成员。我们在2021年至2022年进行了数字录音的半结构化访谈。采用框架分析法对数据进行分析。
我们采访了22名参与者,包括来自英国各地的主要研究者、高级试验协调员和研究执行护士。确定了六个主题:这些主题解释了疫情期间全国范围内的协调应对如何在管理重症监护研究应对措施方面影响个人、研究和更广泛的组织,突出了对重症监护研究的未来影响。
利用新冠疫情期间在重症监护领域看到的集体应对措施,可以更好地支持将研究活动融入常规重症监护活动。未来的努力应集中在人员准备、应急规划、研究优先排序策略以及将研究作为临床护理连续过程的一部分进行整合。